Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109112›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Monitoring gestational weight gain and prepregnancy BMI using the 2009 IOM guidelines in the global population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jose Alberto Martínez-Hortelano, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, Miriam Garrido-Miguel, Alba Soriano-Cano, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Double Burden of Malnutrition Prevalence in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Adequacy of gestational weight gain according to the brazilian charts: a comparison with the Institute of Medicine recommendations.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jose Alberto Martínez-HortelanoUniversidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Social and Health Care Research Center, Santa Teresa Jornet s/n, 16071, Cuenca, Spain.
Iván Cavero-RedondoUniversidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Social and Health Care Research Center, Santa Teresa Jornet s/n, 16071, Cuenca, Spain.
Celia Álvarez-BuenoUniversidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Social and Health Care Research Center, Santa Teresa Jornet s/n, 16071, Cuenca, Spain. Celia.AlvarezBueno@uclm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6176-1618
Miriam Garrido-MiguelUniversidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Social and Health Care Research Center, Santa Teresa Jornet s/n, 16071, Cuenca, Spain.
Alba Soriano-CanoUniversidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Social and Health Care Research Center, Santa Teresa Jornet s/n, 16071, Cuenca, Spain.
Vicente Martínez-VizcaínoUniversidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Social and Health Care Research Center, Santa Teresa Jornet s/n, 16071, Cuenca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have reported a high prevalence of excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) in women with prepregnancy BMI classified as overweight and obese. However, the joint evidence regarding GWG and prepregnancy BMI in the worldwide population has not been synthesized. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate global and regional mean GWG and the prevalence of GWG above, within and below 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines. Second, we aimed to estimate global and regional prepregnancy BMI and the prevalence of BMI categories according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification.

methodsWe searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science to identify observational studies until 9 May 2018. We included studies published from 2009 that used 2009 IOM guidelines, reporting data from women in general population with singleton pregnancies. The 2009 IOM categories for GWG and the WHO categories for prepregnancy BMI were used. DerSimonian and Laird random effects methods were used to estimate the pooled and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the mean and by category rates of GWG and prepregnancy BMI, calculated by global and regions.

resultsSixty-three published studies from 29 countries with a total sample size of 1,416,915 women were included. The global prevalence of GWG above and below the 2009 IOM guidelines, was 27.8% (95% CI; 26.5, 29.1) and 39.4% (95% CI; 37.1, 41.7), respectively. Furthermore, meta-regression analyses showed that the mean GWG and the prevalence of GWG above guidelines have increased. The global prevalence of overweight and obesity, was 23.0% (95% CI; 22.3, 23.7) and 16.3% (95% CI; 15.4, 17.4), respectively. The highest mean GWG and prepregnancy BMI were in North America and the lowest were in Asia.

conclusionsConsidering the high prevalence of GWG above the 2009 IOM guidelines and women with overweight/obesity and their continuously increasing trend in most regions, clinicians should recommend lifestyle interventions to improve women's weight during reproductive age. Due to regional variability, these interventions should be adapted to each cultural context.

trial registrationProspectively registered with PROSPERO ( CRD42018093562 ).

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringGestational Weight GainGlobal Burden of DiseaseBody Mass IndexFemaleHealthy LifestyleHumansNational Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine DivisionOverweightPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy in ObesityPrevalenceUnited StatesGestational weight gainInstitute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelinesPrepregnancy body mass indexTrend

Identifiers

PMID33109112
PMCPMC7590483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.