Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109084›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2020

The evolution of fruit scent: phylogenetic and developmental constraints.

Omer Nevo, Kim Valenta, Annemarie Kleiner, Diary Razafimandimby, Juan Antonio James Jeffrey, Colin A Chapman, Manfred Ayasse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analyzing Volatile Compounds of Young and MatureFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Omer NevoInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. omer.nevo@evolutionary-ecology.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3549-4509
Kim ValentaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Annemarie KleinerInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Diary RazafimandimbyFaculty of Sciences, Zoology and Animal Biodiversity, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Juan Antonio James JeffreyInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Colin A ChapmanDepartment of Anthropology, Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Manfred AyasseInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEGeorge Washington University · USUniversity of Antananarivo · MGUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft NE2156/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFruit scent is increasingly recognized as an evolved signal whose function is to attract animal seed dispersers and facilitate plant reproduction. However, like all traits, fruit scent is likely to evolve in response to conflicting selective pressures and various constraints. Two major constraints are (i) phylogenetic constraints, in which traits are inherited from ancestors rather than adapted to current conditions and (ii) developmental constraints, if phenotypes are limited by the expression of other traits within the individual. We tested whether phylogenetic constraints play a role in fruit scent evolution by calculating the phylogenetic signal in ripe fruits of 98 species from three study sites. We then estimated the importance of developmental constraints by examining whether ripe fruits tend to emit compounds that are chemically similar to, and share biosynthetic pathways with, compounds emitted by conspecific unripe fruits from which they develop.

resultsWe show that closely related taxa are not more similar to each other than to very distinct taxa, thus indicating that fruit scent shows little phylogenetic signal. At the same time, although ripe and unripe fruits of the same species tend to emit different chemicals, they tend to employ chemicals originating from similar biosynthetic pathways, thus indicating that some developmental constraints determine ripe fruit scent.

conclusionsOur results highlight the complex landscape in which fruit scent has evolved. On one hand, fruit scent evolution is not limited by common ancestry. On the other hand, the range of chemicals that can be employed in ripe fruits is probably constrained by the needs of unripe fruits.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularOdorantsPhylogenyFruitDevelopmental constraintsFrugivoryOlfactory communicationPhylogenetic signalPlant evolutionSeed dispersal

Identifiers

PMID33109084
PMCPMC7590443
OpenAlexW3095915106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.