Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109072›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

optimalFlow: optimal transport approach to flow cytometry gating and population matching.

Eustasio Del Barrio, Hristo Inouzhe, Jean-Michel Loubes, Carlos Matrán, Agustín Mayo-Íscar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eustasio Del BarrioDepartamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Valladolid, Calle Paseo de Belén, Valladolid, Spain.
Hristo InouzheDepartamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Valladolid, Calle Paseo de Belén, Valladolid, Spain. hristo.inouzhe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3662-518X
Jean-Michel LoubesUniversité Paul Sabatier, Route de Narbonne, Toulouse, France.
Carlos MatránDepartamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Valladolid, Calle Paseo de Belén, Valladolid, Spain.
Agustín Mayo-ÍscarDepartamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Valladolid, Calle Paseo de Belén, Valladolid, Spain.
Universidad de Valladolid · ESUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData obtained from flow cytometry present pronounced variability due to biological and technical reasons. Biological variability is a well-known phenomenon produced by measurements on different individuals, with different characteristics such as illness, age, sex, etc. The use of different settings for measurement, the variation of the conditions during experiments and the different types of flow cytometers are some of the technical causes of variability. This mixture of sources of variability makes the use of supervised machine learning for identification of cell populations difficult. The present work is conceived as a combination of strategies to facilitate the task of supervised gating.

resultsWe propose optimalFlowTemplates, based on a similarity distance and Wasserstein barycenters, which clusters cytometries and produces prototype cytometries for the different groups. We show that supervised learning, restricted to the new groups, performs better than the same techniques applied to the whole collection. We also present optimalFlowClassification, which uses a database of gated cytometries and optimalFlowTemplates to assign cell types to a new cytometry. We show that this procedure can outperform state of the art techniques in the proposed datasets. Our code is freely available as optimalFlow, a Bioconductor R package at https://bioconductor.org/packages/optimalFlow .

conclusionsoptimalFlowTemplates + optimalFlowClassification addresses the problem of using supervised learning while accounting for biological and technical variability. Our methodology provides a robust automated gating workflow that handles the intrinsic variability of flow cytometry data well. Our main innovation is the methodology itself and the optimal transport techniques that we apply to flow cytometry analysis.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisDatabases as TopicFlow CytometryHumansStatistics as TopicSupervised Machine LearningClusteringFlow cytometry gatingOptimal transportSupervised classificationWasserstein distance

Identifiers

PMID33109072
PMCPMC7590740
OpenAlexW2960727221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.