Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109071›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2020

A cross-sectional study on the burden and impact of migraine on work productivity and quality of life in selected workplaces in the Philippines.

Nel Jason Haw, Ian Theodore Cabaluna, Germaine Erika Kaw, Joanna Feliz Cortez, Maria Pamela Chua, Kristel Guce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Middle meningeal artery embolization for migraine: A review.Surgical neurology international · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Migraine self-management at work: a qualitative study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nel Jason HawHealth Sciences Program, School of Science and Engineering, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines. nhaw@ateneo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2602-4214
Ian Theodore CabalunaWellbridge Health Inc., Manila City, Philippines.
Germaine Erika KawWellbridge Health Inc., Manila City, Philippines.
Joanna Feliz CortezWellbridge Health Inc., Manila City, Philippines.
Maria Pamela ChuaNovartis Healthcare Philippines, Inc., Makati City, Philippines.
Kristel GuceNovartis Healthcare Philippines, Inc., Makati City, Philippines.
Department of Health · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine imposes a substantial personal and economic burden to many working age individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the burden and impact of migraine on work productivity in selected workplaces in the Philippines.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among employees suspected or diagnosed with migraine February to May 2020. Volunteer employees were screened for migraine using the ID-Migraine™ test. Eligible employees were tested for migraine severity and impact on work productivity using the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Quality of life was measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire and additional questions on triggers, coping mechanisms, workplace assistance, and health care utilization were asked. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of migraine disability (high - MIDAS Grade III/IV vs. low - MIDAS Grade I/II). Differences in quality of life scores by migraine disability were measured using multiple linear regression. Productivity costs lost to migraine disability were calculated as the number of days lost to migraine multiplied by the self-reported wage rate, and costs according to migraine severity were measured using a two-part generalized linear model.

resultsFrom around 24,000 employees who were invited to participate in the survey, 954 respondents provided consent and attempted to respond to the survey resulting to a response rate of around 4.1%. A total of 511 positive migraine screens were included in the final sample. Females comprised two-thirds of all positive migraine screens and were more likely to have high migraine disability (odds ratio: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.03-2.49) than males. Those with high migraine disability scored lower on role limitations compared to those with low migraine disability. Stress and looking at computer screens were cited as the top trigger for migraine, while sleeping enough hours and getting a massage were cited as top coping mechanisms. Three in four (77%) visited their company clinic within the past 3 months, which meant that most doctors seen for migraine-related symptoms were general practitioners. Five in six (85%) took medication for migraine, almost all of which were over-the-counter medications. Mean annual productivity costs lost due to migraine disability were PHP27 794 (USD556) per person.

conclusionMigraine poses a significant threat to work productivity in the Philippines. Many opportunities, such as disease management and introduction of alternative options for migraine treatment, may be introduced to help address these issues.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePhilippinesWorkplaceBurden of diseaseCost of illnessHealth care utilizationMigrainePhilippinesQuality of lifeWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID33109071
PMCPMC7590802
OpenAlexW3096938227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.