Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33109008›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Microplastic exposure interacts with habitat degradation to affect behaviour and survival of juvenile fish in the field.

Mark I McCormick, Douglas P Chivers, Maud C O Ferrari, Makeely I Blandford, Gerrit B Nanninga, Celia Richardson, Eric P Fakan, George Vamvounis, Alexandra M Gulizia, Bridie J M Allan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Microplastics: impacts on corals and other reef organisms.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mark I McCormickARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
Douglas P ChiversDepartment of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon SK S7N 5E2, Canada.
Maud C O FerrariDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, WCVM, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon SK S7 W 5B4, Canada.
Makeely I BlandfordARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
Gerrit B NanningaSchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
Celia RichardsonDepartment of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Eric P FakanARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
George VamvounisCollege of Sciences and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
Alexandra M GuliziaCollege of Sciences and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
Bridie J M AllanDepartment of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies · AUJames Cook University · AUUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reefs are degrading globally due to increased environmental stressors including warming and elevated levels of pollutants. These stressors affect not only habitat-forming organisms, such as corals, but they may also directly affect the organisms that inhabit these ecosystems. Here, we explore how the dual threat of habitat degradation and microplastic exposure may affect the behaviour and survival of coral reef fish in the field. Fish were caught prior to settlement and pulse-fed polystyrene microplastics six times over 4 days, then placed in the field on live or dead-degraded coral patches. Exposure to microplastics or dead coral led fish to be bolder, more active and stray further from shelter compared to control fish. Effect sizes indicated that plastic exposure had a greater effect on behaviour than degraded habitat, and we found no evidence of synergistic effects. This pattern was also displayed in their survival in the field. Our results highlight that attaining low concentrations of microplastic in the environment will be a useful management strategy, since minimizing microplastic intake by fishes may work concurrently with reef restoration strategies to enhance the resilience of coral reef populations.

Indexed as

Coral ReefsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalEcosystemFishesMicroplasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalMicroplasticsWater Pollutants, Chemicalclimate changecoral reef fishhabitat degradationmicroplasticspollutionpredator–prey

Identifiers

PMID33109008
PMCPMC7661286
OpenAlexW3095562531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.