ArticleAsian spine journal2020
Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Techniques, Technologies, and Indications.
Article in Asian spine journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review and update on diagnosis and treatment of new onset sacroiliac joint dysfunction after lumbar fusion.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of uniportal and biportal endoscopic ULBD techniques in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026Trial
- 3D ultrasound shape completion and anatomical feature detection for minimally invasive spine surgery.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive approaches to intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Review
- Abd-El-Barr's Mountain-A Radiographic Landmark for Consistent and Successful Docking in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery: A Cadaveric Study.International journal of spine surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Mounting the learning curve in unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression in an Asian population: experience of a single surgeon's first 105 consecutive cases with early functional outcomes.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
- Comparison of short-term effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and MED-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for mild single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- An optimal disc height changes for successful indirect decompression with OLIF.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity and the Future.Global spine journal · 2025Article
- Advancements in Spinal Endoscopic Surgery: Comprehensive Techniques and Pathologies Addressed by Full Endoscopy Beyond Lumbar Disc Herniation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Utilization of Navigation and Emerging Technologies With Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.Neurospine · 2025Article
- The feasibility of robotic navigation in single position oblique lateral spine surgery. A technical note and a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Application and research progress of tranexamic acid in the perioperative period of posterior lumbar interbody fusion.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Surgical options for metastatic spine tumors: WFNS spine committee recommendations.Neurosurgical review · 2024Review
- Is minimally invasive surgery a game changer in spinal surgery?Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Clarifying misconceptions in modern neurosurgery: an open letter to the neurosurgical community.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past few decades, interest in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has increased tremendously due to its core principle of minimizing approach-related injury while providing outcomes similar to traditional open spine procedures. With technical and technological advancements, MISS has expanded its utility not only to simple spinal stenosis, but also to complex spinal pathologies such as metastasis, trauma, or adult spinal deformity. In this article, we review the techniques and technology in MISS and discuss the indications, benefits, and limitations of MISS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.