Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108801›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2021

Automatic Detection and Scoring of Kidney Stones on Noncontrast CT Images Using S.T.O.N.E. Nephrolithometry: Combined Deep Learning and Thresholding Methods.

Yingpu Cui, Zhaonan Sun, Shuai Ma, Weipeng Liu, Xiangpeng Wang, Xiaodong Zhang, Xiaoying Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Deep learning is a promising technology and seems to be the future of the CT stone evaluation.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yingpu CuiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Zhaonan SunDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Shuai MaDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Weipeng LiuBeijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Xiangpeng WangBeijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiaoying WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, 8, Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. wangxiaoying@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9822-961X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and validate a deep learning and thresholding-based model for automatic kidney stone detection and scoring according to S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry. PROCEDURES: Abdominal noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) images were retrospectively archived from February 2018 to April 2019 for three parts: a segmentation dataset (n = 167), a hydronephrosis classification dataset (n = 282), and test dataset (n = 117). The model consisted of four steps. First, the 3D U-Nets for kidney and renal sinus segmentation were developed. Second, the deep 3D dual-path networks for hydronephrosis grading were developed. Third, the thresholding methods were used to detect and segment stones in the renal sinus region. The stone size, CT attenuation, and tract length were calculated from the segmented stone region. Fourth, the stone's location was determined. The stone detection performance was estimated with sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). The hydronephrosis grading and stone size, tract length, number of involved calyces, and essence grading were estimated with the area under the curve (AUC) method and linear-weighted κ statistics, respectively.

resultsThe stone detection algorithm reached a sensitivity of 95.9 % (236/246) and a PPV of 98.7 % (236/239). The hydronephrosis classification algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.97. The scoring model results showed good agreement with radiologist results for the stone size, tract length, number of involved calyces, and essence grading (κ = 0.95, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.92, 0.98; κ = 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.95, 1.00; κ = 0.95, 95 % CI: 0.92, 0.98; and κ = 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.94, 1.00), respectively.

conclusionsThe scoring model was constructed that can automatically detect and score stones in NCCT images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPattern Recognition, AutomatedAgedAlgorithmsArea Under CurveContrast MediaFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKidney CalculiMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaComputer-assistedDeep learningImage processingKidney stoneMultidetector computed tomographySeverity of illness index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.