Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108706›Full record

ArticleCancer cytopathology2021

Formalin fixation for optimal concordance of programmed death-ligand 1 immunostaining between cytologic and histologic specimens from patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Bregje M Koomen, Jose van der Starre-Gaal, Judith M Vonk, Jan H von der Thüsen, Jacqueline J C van der Meij, Kim Monkhorst, Stefan M Willems, Wim Timens, Nils A 't Hart

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cytopathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Bregje M KoomenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3106-5734
Jose van der Starre-GaalDepartment of Pathology, Isala Hospitals, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Judith M VonkDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jan H von der ThüsenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jacqueline J C van der MeijPathologie Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Kim MonkhorstDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stefan M WillemsDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wim TimensDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Nils A 't HartDepartment of Pathology, Isala Hospitals, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLErasmus MC · NLFriesland College · NLIsala · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunohistochemical staining of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is used to determine which patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may benefit most from immunotherapy. Therapeutic management of many patients with NSCLC is based on cytology instead of histology. In this study, concordance of PD-L1 immunostaining between cytology cell blocks and their histologic counterparts was analyzed. Furthermore, the effect of various fixatives and fixation times on PD-L1 immunoreactivity was studied.

methodsPaired histologic and cytologic samples from 67 patients with NSCLC were collected by performing fine-needle aspiration on pneumonectomy/lobectomy specimens. Formalin-fixed, agar-based or CytoLyt/PreservCyt-fixed Cellient cell blocks were prepared. Sections from cell blocks and tissue blocks were stained with SP263 (standardized assay) and 22C3 (laboratory-developed test) antibodies. PD-L1 scores were compared between histology and cytology. In addition, immunostaining was compared between PD-L1-expressing human cell lines fixed in various fixatives at increasing increments in fixation duration.

resultsAgar cell blocks and tissue blocks showed substantial agreement (κ = 0.70 and κ = 0.67, respectively), whereas fair-to-moderate agreement was found between Cellient cell blocks and histology (κ = 0.28 and κ = 0.49, respectively). Cell lines fixed in various alcohol-based fixatives showed less PD-L1 immunoreactivity compared with those fixed in formalin. In contrast to SP263, additional formalin fixation after alcohol fixation resulted in preserved staining intensity using the 22C3 laboratory-developed test and the 22C3 pharmDx assay.

conclusionsPerforming PD-L1 staining on cytologic specimens fixed in alcohol-based fixatives could result in false-negative immunostaining results, whereas fixation in formalin leads to higher and more histology-concordant PD-L1 immunostaining. The deleterious effect of alcohol fixation could be reversed to some degree by postfixation in formalin.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFormaldehydeHumansImmunohistochemistryLung NeoplasmsMaleTissue FixationB7-H1 AntigenFormaldehyde22C3 antibodyimmunocytochemistryimmunohistochemistrynon-small cell lung carcinomaprogrammed cell death-ligand 1SP263 antibodytissue fixation

Identifiers

PMID33108706
PMCPMC8246726
OpenAlexW3095753037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.