Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108689›Full record

Observational studyClinical and translational science2021

Attitudes of Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients and Investigators Toward Genomic Study Enrollment, Consent Process, and Return of Genetic Results.

Alisa D Blazek, Daniel D Kinnamon, Elizabeth Jordan, Hanyu Ni, Ray E Hershberger

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The DCM Project Portal: A direct-to-participant platform of The DCM Research Project.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  4. The DCM Project Portal: A direct-to-participant platform of The DCM Research Project.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alisa D BlazekDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Daniel D KinnamonDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Elizabeth JordanDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Hanyu NiDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ray E HershbergerDivision of Human Genetics & Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Precision Medicine for Dilated Cardiomyopathy in European and African AncestryR01HL128857 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HERSHBERGER, RAY E. · 2015 to 2020
$12.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine genetics study design requires large, diverse cohorts and thoughtful use of electronic technologies. Involving patients in research design may increase enrollment and engagement, thereby enabling a means to relevant patient outcomes in clinical practice. Few data, however, illustrate attitudes of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and their family members toward genetic study design. This study assessed attitudes of 16 enrolled patients and their family members (P/FM), and 18 investigators or researchers (I/R) of the ongoing DCM Precision Medicine Study during a conjoint patient and investigator meeting using structured, self-administered surveys examining direct-to-participant enrollment and web-based consent, return of genetic results, and other aspects of genetic study design. Survey respondents were half women and largely identified as white. Web-based consent was supported by 93% of P/FM and 88% of I/R. Most respondents believed that return of genetic results would motivate study enrollment, but also indicated a desire to opt out. Ideal study design preferences included a 1-hour visit per year, along with the ability to complete study aspects by telephone or web and possibility of prophylactic medication. This study supports partnership of patients and clinical researchers to inform research priorities and study design to attain the promise of precision medicine for DCM.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdolescentAdultAgedCardiomyopathy, DilatedFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInformed ConsentMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPilot ProjectsPrecision MedicineResearch PersonnelSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33108689
PMCPMC7993282
OpenAlexW3095464438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.