Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108674›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2021

Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: A drug utilisation study in Europe.

Massoud Toussi, Margarita Shlaen, Florence Coste, Hanka de Voogd, Vasilis Dimos, Sigal Kaplan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Massoud ToussiDepartment Real World Solutions, IQVIA, La Défense Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6780-0676
Margarita ShlaenDepartment Real World Solutions, IQVIA, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4238-1759
Florence CosteDepartment Epidemiology and Risk-Benefit, Sanofi Aventis R&D, Chilly Mazarin, France.
Hanka de VoogdDepartment Global Clinical Research, Mylan, Lyon, France.
Vasilis DimosDepartment Pharmacovigilance (medical section), Demo S.A., Athens, Greece.
Sigal KaplanDepartment Pharmacoepidemiology, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Netanya, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3352-8480
Athens Medical Center · GRGlobal Services (Slovakia) · SKIQVIA (France) · FRIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GBSanofi (France) · FRTeva Pharmaceuticals (Israel) · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the risk minimisation measures (RMMs) implemented in Europe in 2014 for valproate-containing products to mitigate their risk during pregnancy and to characterise valproate prescribing patterns in women of childbearing potential (WCBP) before and after implementation of RMMs.

methodsA multinational cohort study based on existing data sources using a pre-/post- design was performed in five European countries (France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, UK) in an outpatient setting. Effectiveness of RMMs was assessed by comparing the proportion of valproate initiations as second (or subsequent) line therapy before and after implementation of RMMs (primary outcome) with an increase in this proportion indicating success of RMMs. Overall use of valproate and incidence of pregnancies in WCBP were also examined.

resultsThe proportion of valproate initiations as second line therapy increased after implementation of RMMs in incident female users in Sweden (from 81.1%, 95% CI 79.9%-82.3% to 84.5%, 95% CI 83.5%-85.5%) and the UK (from 66.4%, 95% CI 64.5%-68.3% to 72.4%, 95% CI 70.0%-74.9%), it remained the same in Germany and Spain and decreased in France from 48.7% (95% CI 45.6%-51.9%) to 40.6% (95% CI 37.6%-43.7%). In Sweden and the UK, the incidence of pregnancies exposed to valproate decreased in the post-implementation period: 8.0 vs 9.5 and 10.9 vs 16.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively.

conclusionThe results on primary outcome of this study suggest limited effectiveness of the RMMs. Additional RMMs were implemented in 2018.

Indexed as

Drug UtilizationValproic AcidCohort StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansPregnancySpainValproic Aciddrug utilisation studypharmacoepidemiologyrisk minimisation measuresvalproate

Identifiers

PMID33108674
PMCPMC7894134
OpenAlexW3096200138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.