Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108489›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2020

[Early assessment of the risk of later implantloosening using Roentgen Sterophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA)].

F Seehaus, R Sonntag, M Schwarze, E Jakubowitz, S Sesselmann, J P Kretzer, C Hurschler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

F SeehausLehrstuhl für Orthopädie mit Orthopädischer Chirurgie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Rathsberger Straße 57, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. frank.seehaus@fau.de.
R SonntagLabor für Biomechanik und Implantatforschung, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
M SchwarzeLabor für Biomechanik und Biomaterialien, Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
E JakubowitzLabor für Biomechanik und Biomaterialien, Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
S SesselmannInstitut für Medizintechnik, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden, Amberg-Weiden, Deutschland.
J P KretzerLabor für Biomechanik und Implantatforschung, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
C HurschlerLabor für Biomechanik und Biomaterialien, Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEOstbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAseptic implant loosening is the most common cause of implant revisions in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) represents the current gold standard for the in-vivo assessment of implant fixation. PRESENT SITUATION: Long-term clinical trials have shown that continuous implant migration within the first two postoperative years correlates strongly with a later aseptic loosening. Thus, the implant migration measured with RSA can be regarded as a reliable surrogate marker for later implant loosening. Over the past 40 years, RSA has been continuously further developed, and the model-based RSA approach has reduced the effort involved since markers attached to implant are no longer needed. PERSPECTIVES: The RSA method is gaining importance in the certification process of new orthopaedic implants-for example, the Dutch Orthopedic Society has recommended phased-introduction and RSA studies for new hip implants. Furthermore, in the context of the new EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), which took effect in May 2017, RSA gained relevance for investigating clinically unproven implants. Critics who associate MDR with hindering innovation can be countered in that the RSA method provides a predictive assessment of implant fixation after only two years of follow-up, which is significantly shorter than standard long-term clinical trials.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHip ProsthesisKnee ProsthesisHumansProsthesis FailureRadiostereometric AnalysisImplantat fixationIn-vivo-diagnosticMigrationRSATotal joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID33108489
OpenAlexW3097829942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.