Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108480›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2020

[Joint arthrodesis in functionally favorable position : Considerations on measurement of disability in private accident insurance].

H-T Klemm, V Wittchen, W Willauschus, R A Fuhrmann, B Hohendorff

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H-T KlemmFreies Institut für medizinische Begutachtungen, Ludwigstraße 25, 95444, Bayreuth, Deutschland. dr.klemm@fimb.de.
V WittchenDr. Eick & Partner Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB, Hamm, Deutschland.
W WillauschusFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung (FGIMB e. V.), Hamburg, Deutschland.
R A FuhrmannFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung (FGIMB e. V.), Hamburg, Deutschland.
B HohendorffHandchirurgie, Abteilung Hand‑, Ästhetische und Plastische Chirurgie, Elbe-Klinikum Stade, Stade, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If an accident results in a functional disorder that persists and permanently restricts physical and/or mental capacity, this is referred to as a disability. In private accident insurance it is the task of the medical expert to assess this disability by examining the medical findings and produce an assessment taking account of the literature and comparing against generally acknowledged guidance values. The priority dismemberment disability rating schedule initially provides loss values. For the "next lowest" disability levels for arthrodesis of extremity joints, the assessment recommendations are based on a functionally favorable position although this functionally favorable position is not more precisely defined.In this article the authors have defined these functionally favorable positions based on the information available in the literature. In particular, the operatively favorable settings for arthrodesis of the affected joint that are stated in the literature on trauma and orthopedic surgery were consulted. Of course, the functional perspective has been especially emphasized.A difficulty in achieving this was that the literature on arthrodesis is now almost only of historical value due to modern endoprosthetics. The knowledge gained was checked against medical experience and is expounded here.

Indexed as

Expert TestimonyInsurance, AccidentAccidentsArthrodesisDisability EvaluationAssessment recommendationsDisabilityGeneral accident insurance conditionsMedical assesmentPrivate accident insurance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.