Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108455›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2020

Oligomonocytic and overt chronic myelomonocytic leukemia show similar clinical, genomic, and immunophenotypic features.

Xavier Calvo, Nieves Garcia-Gisbert, Ivonne Parraga, Joan Gibert, Lourdes Florensa, Marcio Andrade-Campos, Brayan Merchan, Sara Garcia-Avila, Sara Montesdeoca, Concepción Fernández-Rodríguez and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Myeloid Neoplasms With Oligomonocytosis Exhibit Heterogenous Pathologic and Genetic Features.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Haematologica · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xavier CalvoLaboratori de Citologia Hematològica, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Translacional en Neoplàsies Hematològiques (GRETNHE), and.
Nieves Garcia-GisbertLaboratori de Biologia Molecular, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Clínica Aplicada en Neoplàsies Hematològiques, IMIM Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Ivonne ParragaLaboratori de Citologia Hematològica, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Translacional en Neoplàsies Hematològiques (GRETNHE), and.
Joan GibertLaboratori de Biologia Molecular, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Clínica Aplicada en Neoplàsies Hematològiques, IMIM Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Lourdes FlorensaLaboratori de Citologia Hematològica, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Translacional en Neoplàsies Hematològiques (GRETNHE), and.
Marcio Andrade-CamposServei d'Hematologia Clínica, Grup de Recerca Clínica Aplicada en Neoplàsies Hematològiques.
Brayan MerchanServei d'Hematologia Clínica, Grup de Recerca Clínica Aplicada en Neoplàsies Hematològiques.
Sara Garcia-AvilaServei d'Hematologia Clínica, Grup de Recerca Clínica Aplicada en Neoplàsies Hematològiques.
Sara MontesdeocaLaboratori de Citologia Hematològica, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Translacional en Neoplàsies Hematològiques (GRETNHE), and.
Concepción Fernández-RodríguezLaboratori de Biologia Molecular, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Clínica Aplicada en Neoplàsies Hematològiques, IMIM Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta SalidoLaboratori de Genètica Molecular, and.
Anna PuiggrosLaboratori de Genètica Molecular, and.
Blanca EspinetLaboratori de Genètica Molecular, and.
Luís ColomoDepartament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; and.
David Roman-BravoLaboratori de Citologia Hematològica, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Translacional en Neoplàsies Hematològiques (GRETNHE), and.
Beatriz BellosilloLaboratori de Biologia Molecular, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Clínica Aplicada en Neoplàsies Hematològiques, IMIM Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana FerrerLaboratori de Citologia Hematològica, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Translacional en Neoplàsies Hematològiques (GRETNHE), and.
Leonor ArenillasLaboratori de Citologia Hematològica, Servei de Patologia, Grup de Recerca Translacional en Neoplàsies Hematològiques (GRETNHE), and.
Universitat Pompeu Fabra · ESHospital Del Mar · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oligomonocytic chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (OM-CMML) is defined as those myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable with relative monocytosis (≥10% monocytes) and a monocyte count of 0.5 to <1 × 109/L. These patients show clinical and genomic features similar to those of overt chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), although most of them are currently categorized as MDS, according to the World Health Organization 2017 classification. We analyzed the clinicopathologic features of 40 patients with OM-CMML with well-annotated immunophenotypic and molecular data and compared them to those of 56 patients with overt CMML. We found similar clinical, morphological, and cytogenetic features. In addition, OM-CMML mirrored the well-known complex molecular profile of CMML, except for the presence of a lower percentage of RAS pathway mutations. In this regard, of the different genes assessed, only CBL was found to be mutated at a significantly lower frequency. Likewise, the OM-CMML immunophenotypic profile, assessed by the presence of >94% classical monocytes (MO1s) and CD56 and/or CD2 positivity in peripheral blood monocytes, was similar to overt CMML. The MO1 percentage >94% method showed high accuracy for predicting CMML diagnosis (sensitivity, 90.7%; specificity, 92.2%), even when considering OM-CMML as a subtype of CMML (sensitivity, 84.9%; specificity, 92.1%) in our series of 233 patients (39 OM-CMML, 54 CMML, 23 MDS, and 15 myeloproliferative neoplasms with monocytosis and 102 reactive monocytosis). These results support the consideration of OM-CMML as a distinctive subtype of CMML.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicMyelodysplastic SyndromesMyeloproliferative DisordersGenomicsHumansImmunophenotyping

Identifiers

PMID33108455
PMCPMC7594385
OpenAlexW3096773647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.