Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108401›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The major satellite DNA families of the diploid Chenopodium album aggregate species: Arguments for and against the "library hypothesis".

Alexander Belyayev, Michaela Jandová, Jiřina Josefiová, Ruslan Kalendar, Václav Mahelka, Bohumil Mandák, Karol Krak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. From minor loci to major players? Satellite DNA diversification in Crepis sensu stricto.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Repeatome Analysis and Satellite DNA Chromosome Patterns inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Satellitome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. The Genomics of Plant Satellite DNA.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander BelyayevThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8933-6197
Michaela JandováThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Jiřina JosefiováThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Ruslan KalendarDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3986-2460
Václav MahelkaThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Bohumil MandákThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Karol KrakThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Satellite DNA (satDNA) is one of the major fractions of the eukaryotic nuclear genome. Highly variable satDNA is involved in various genome functions, and a clear link between satellites and phenotypes exists in a wide range of organisms. However, little is known about the origin and temporal dynamics of satDNA. The "library hypothesis" indicates that the rapid evolutionary changes experienced by satDNAs are mostly quantitative. Although this hypothesis has received some confirmation, a number of its aspects are still controversial. A recently developed next-generation sequencing (NGS) method allows the determination of the satDNA landscape and could shed light on unresolved issues. Here, we explore low-coverage NGS data to infer satDNA evolution in the phylogenetic context of the diploid species of the Chenopodium album aggregate. The application of the Illumina read assembly algorithm in combination with Oxford Nanopore sequencing and fluorescent in situ hybridization allowed the estimation of eight satDNA families within the studied group, six of which were newly described. The obtained set of satDNA families of different origins can be divided into several categories, namely group-specific, lineage-specific and species-specific. In the process of evolution, satDNA families can be transmitted vertically and can be eliminated over time. Moreover, transposable element-derived satDNA families may appear repeatedly in the satellitome, creating an illusion of family conservation. Thus, the obtained data refute the "library hypothesis", rather than confirming it, and in our opinion, it is more appropriate to speak about "the library of the mechanisms of origin".

Indexed as

DiploidyEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantChenopodium albumDNA, PlantDNA, SatelliteGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenySpecies SpecificityDNA, PlantDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID33108401
PMCPMC7591062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.