Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108375›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Efficacy of Banxia Xiexin decoction for chronic atrophic gastritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yang Cao, Yixin Zheng, Jingbin Niu, Chunmei Zhu, Decai Yang, Fen Rong, Guoping Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Research Status and Prospects ofGastroenterology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Efficacy of a Traditional Herbal Formula,Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang CaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yixin ZhengSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jingbin NiuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chunmei ZhuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Decai YangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fen RongSchool of Public Health, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Guoping LiuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0749-5478
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBanxia Xiexin decoction (BXD), a classical formula of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has been wildly used for chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) patients with the cold-heat complex syndrome in China, and achieved satisfied effects. However, the clinical effects of it remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of BXD for CAG treatment.

methodsWe searched seven electronic databases including Ovid, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Wan-fang database, VIP (Chinese Scientific Journals Database) and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from their inception to September 21, 2020. We used Jadad scale and Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool to make evaluation of methodological quality. Revman 5.3 statistical software was used for statistical processing to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of BXD.

results26 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) totaling 1985 patients were identified for analysis. Meta-analysis showed that BXD treatment was more effective (RR 1.29; 95%CI 1.24, 1.35; P<0.00001) and safe (MD 0.33; 95%CI 0.18, 0.58; P = 0.0002) than Chinese patent medicine + western medicine. Furthermore, BXD had improvement on symptoms scores such as stomach distending pain, and belching. Besides, BXD was more effective in inhibiting Helicobacter Pylori (HP), improving HP-related inflammation, and relieving the degree of glandular atrophy, intestinal metaplasia (IM), and dysplasia of gastric mucosa (GM).

conclusionsThe meta-analysis showed that BXD was more effective and safer for CAG patients than the control group. However, due to limitations of methodological quality and small sample size of the included studies, further standardized research of rigorous design should be needed.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseDrugs, Chinese HerbalGastritis, AtrophicHumansTreatment Outcomebanxia xiexin decoctionDrugs, Chinese Herbal

Identifiers

PMID33108375
PMCPMC7591022
OpenAlexW3094682236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.