Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108314›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

The Public's Perception of the Severity and Global Impact at the Start of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Crowdsourcing-Based Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Orr Shauly, Gregory Stone, Daniel Gould

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Effect of Wearing a Mask on Facial Attractiveness.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Public Perception of Ideal Breast Shape.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Orr Shauly *Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1714-8998
Gregory Stone *Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0857-2914
Daniel Gould *Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3576-3775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 is a rapidly developing threat to most people in the United States and abroad. The behaviors of the public are important to understand, as they may have a tremendous impact on the course of this novel coronavirus pandemic.

objectiveThis study intends to assess the US population's perception and knowledge of the virus as a threat and the behaviors of the general population in response.

methodsA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with random volunteers recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk, an internet crowdsourcing service, on March 24, 2020.

resultsA total of 969 participants met the inclusion criteria. It was found that the perceived severity of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly differed between age groups (P<.001) and men and women (P<.001). A majority of study participants were actively adhering to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.

conclusionsThough many participants identified COVID-19 as a threat, many failed to place themselves appropriately in the correct categories with respect to risk. This may indicate a need for additional public education for appropriately defining the risk of this novel pandemic.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesCrowdsourcingFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSARS-CoV-2Young AdultAmazon Mechanical TurkbehaviorCOVID-19, SARS-CoV-2crowdsourcingeducationimpactpandemicperceptionpublic opinionseveritysurvey

Identifiers

PMID33108314
PMCPMC7695545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.