Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108238›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2020

Optimized Management of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Response-Based Phase II Study (OMNIVORE).

Rana R McKay, Bradley A McGregor, Wanling Xie, David A Braun, Xiao Wei, Christos E Kyriakopoulos, Yousef Zakharia, Benjamin L Maughan, Tracy L Rose, Walter M Stadler and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIAdaptive Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03203473 (Phase II Study of Optimized Management of NIVOlumab Based on REsponse in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03203473 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Phase II Study of Optimized Management of NIVOlumab Based on REsponse in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (OMNIVORE Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorToni Choueiri, MDRan2017 to 2026Enrolled85ConditionsRenal CancerArmsIpilimumab, Nivolumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Triplet Strategies in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Worthy Option in the First-Line Setting?American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2023
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Rana R McKayUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0581-7963
Bradley A McGregorDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-8298-0289
Wanling XieDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-8000
David A BraunDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-4543-5553
Xiao WeiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Christos E KyriakopoulosUniversity of Wisconsin, Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI.ORCID 0000-0002-6452-7405
Yousef ZakhariaUniversity of Iowa Health Care, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA.
Benjamin L MaughanUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-0010-8551
Tracy L RoseLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Walter M StadlerUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-2527
David F McDermottBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-5095
Lauren C HarshmanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-1588
Toni K ChoueiriDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Iowa Health Care · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Treating the P13-Kinase/AKTP50CA101942 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI David McDermott · 2003 to 2026
$53.4M
Selective histone deacetylase inhibition with entinostat to enhance the anti-tumor immune response to immune checkpoint inhibition in urothelial cancerK08CA248967 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROSE, TRACY L · 2020 to 2022
$787k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA248967NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS P50 CA101942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this phase II response-adaptive trial, we investigated the rational application of immune checkpoint blockade in renal cell carcinoma (RCC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03203473).

methodsWe enrolled patients with metastatic RCC with no prior checkpoint inhibitor exposure. All patients received nivolumab alone with subsequent arm allocation based on response. Patients with a confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) within 6 months discontinued nivolumab and were observed (arm A). Patients with stable disease or progressive disease (PD) after no more than 6 months of nivolumab received two doses of ipilimumab (arm B). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with PR/CR at 1 year after nivolumab discontinuation (arm A) and proportion of nivolumab nonresponders who converted to PR/CR after ipilimumab (arm B).

resultsOverall, 83 patients initiated treatment, of whom 96% had clear-cell histology, 51% were treatment naïve, and 67% had intermediate/poor-risk disease. Median follow-up was 19.5 months. Within 6 months, induction nivolumab resulted in a confirmed PR in 12% of patients (n = 10). Fourteen patients were not allocated to a study arm (seven because of toxicity, seven because of PD). Twelve patients (14%) were allocated to arm A and discontinued nivolumab, of whom five (42%; 90% CI, 18% to 68%) remained off nivolumab at ≥ 1 year. Of 57 patients (69%) allocated to arm B, two patients converted to a confirmed PR (4%; 90% CI, 1% to 11%), and no CRs were observed.

conclusionIn this study, nivolumab followed by two doses of ipilimumab resulted in no CRs and a low PR/CR conversion. The number of patients evaluated for nivolumab discontinuation was too small to assess the value of this approach. Currently, our data do not support a response-adaptive strategy for checkpoint blockade in advanced RCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID33108238
PMCPMC7768333
OpenAlexW3095969449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.