Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2020
Optimized Management of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Response-Based Phase II Study (OMNIVORE).
Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03203473 (Phase II Study of Optimized Management of NIVOlumab Based on REsponse in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Study of Optimized Management of NIVOlumab Based on REsponse in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (OMNIVORE Study)
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunotherapy rechallenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.The oncologist · 2026Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of belzutifan inhibitor in patients with advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2024Pooled it
- Salvage nivolumab and ipilimumab after prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Immune-based treatment re-challenge in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment-free survival after discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Systemic Therapy and Sequencing Options in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.JAMA oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Long-term follow-up from the OMNIVORE trial: response-adaptive nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Triplet Strategies in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Worthy Option in the First-Line Setting?American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2023Trial
- Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B).Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Trial
- FRACTION-RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Phase II Study of Nivolumab and Salvage Nivolumab/Ipilimumab in Treatment-Naive Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort A).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Trial
- Article
- First-Line Treatment Strategies in IMDC Favourable-Risk Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Retreatment, rechallenge, and escalation with subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies across cancers after initial failure.ESMO open · 2025Review
- Overcoming resistance to anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy: mechanisms, combination strategies, and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Decoy-resistant IL-18 reshapes the tumor microenvironment and enhances rejection by anti-CTLA-4 in renal cell carcinoma.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Outcomes of patients with advanced solid tumors who discontinued immune-checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- A Pooled Analysis of 3 Phase II Trials of Salvage Nivolumab/Ipilimumab After Nivolumab in Renal Cell Carcinoma.The oncologist · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn this phase II response-adaptive trial, we investigated the rational application of immune checkpoint blockade in renal cell carcinoma (RCC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03203473).
methodsWe enrolled patients with metastatic RCC with no prior checkpoint inhibitor exposure. All patients received nivolumab alone with subsequent arm allocation based on response. Patients with a confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) within 6 months discontinued nivolumab and were observed (arm A). Patients with stable disease or progressive disease (PD) after no more than 6 months of nivolumab received two doses of ipilimumab (arm B). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with PR/CR at 1 year after nivolumab discontinuation (arm A) and proportion of nivolumab nonresponders who converted to PR/CR after ipilimumab (arm B).
resultsOverall, 83 patients initiated treatment, of whom 96% had clear-cell histology, 51% were treatment naïve, and 67% had intermediate/poor-risk disease. Median follow-up was 19.5 months. Within 6 months, induction nivolumab resulted in a confirmed PR in 12% of patients (n = 10). Fourteen patients were not allocated to a study arm (seven because of toxicity, seven because of PD). Twelve patients (14%) were allocated to arm A and discontinued nivolumab, of whom five (42%; 90% CI, 18% to 68%) remained off nivolumab at ≥ 1 year. Of 57 patients (69%) allocated to arm B, two patients converted to a confirmed PR (4%; 90% CI, 1% to 11%), and no CRs were observed.
conclusionIn this study, nivolumab followed by two doses of ipilimumab resulted in no CRs and a low PR/CR conversion. The number of patients evaluated for nivolumab discontinuation was too small to assess the value of this approach. Currently, our data do not support a response-adaptive strategy for checkpoint blockade in advanced RCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.