Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33108122›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2020

Disparities in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer in Relation to Disabilities.

Hyoung Woo Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Kyoung Eun Yeob, In Young Cho, So Young Kim, Seon Mee Park, Jong Heon Park, Jong Hyock Park, Ichiro Kawachi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Disability inclusion in research and health care.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New considerations of health disparities within allergy and immunology.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Telehealth Use By Persons with Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hyoung Woo KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
Dong Wook ShinSupportive Care Center/Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyoung Eun YeobCollege of Medicine/Graduate School of Health Science Business Convergence, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
In Young ChoSupportive Care Center/Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
So Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
Seon Mee ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
Jong Heon ParkBig Data Steering Department, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea.
Jong Hyock ParkCollege of Medicine/Graduate School of Health Science Business Convergence, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
Ichiro KawachiHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe investigated potential disparities in the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients with and without disabilities.

methodsWe linked Korean National Disability Registry data with the Korean National Health Insurance database and Korean Central Cancer Registry data. This study included a total of 16,849 people with disabilities and 58,872 age- and sex-matched control subjects in whom GC had been diagnosed.

resultsWhen compared to GC patients without disabilities, patients with disabilities tended to be diagnosed at a later stage (localized stage 53.7% vs 59.0% or stage unknown 10.7% vs 6.9%), especially those with severe disabilities (P < 0.001). This was more evident in patients with mental impairment (localized stage 41.7% and stage unknown 15.2%). In addition, not receiving treatment was more common in patients with disabilities than those without disabilities (29.3% vs 27.2%, P < 0.001), and this disparity was more evident in those with severe disabilities (35.4%) and in those with communication (36.9%) and mental (32.3%) impairment. Patients with disabilities were at slightly higher risk of overall mortality as well as GC-specific mortality compared to people without disabilities (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.21 and aHR = 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.16, respectively), and these disparities were more pronounced in those with severe disabilities (aHR = 1.62 and 1.51, respectively). DISCUSSION: Patients with disabilities, especially severe disabilities, were diagnosed with GC at a later stage, received less staging evaluation and treatment, and their overall survival rate was slightly worse compared to those without disabilities.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPersons with DisabilitiesProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID33108122
PMCPMC7544185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.