Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33107830›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Institution-Specific Machine Learning Models for Prehospital Assessment to Predict Hospital Admission: Prediction Model Development Study.

Toru Shirakawa, Tomohiro Sonoo, Kentaro Ogura, Ryo Fujimori, Konan Hara, Tadahiro Goto, Hideki Hashimoto, Yuji Takahashi, Hiromu Naraba, Kensuke Nakamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial intelligence decision points in an emergency department.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Toru ShirakawaDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4733-0077
Tomohiro SonooTXP Medical Co, Ltd, Chuo-ku, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9182-7059
Kentaro OguraTXP Medical Co, Ltd, Chuo-ku, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0168-4876
Ryo FujimoriTXP Medical Co, Ltd, Chuo-ku, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-4708
Konan HaraTXP Medical Co, Ltd, Chuo-ku, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1487-2638
Tadahiro GotoTXP Medical Co, Ltd, Chuo-ku, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-2968
Hideki HashimotoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3281-8400
Yuji TakahashiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9776-2647
Hiromu NarabaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5663-2213
Kensuke NakamuraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-0294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough multiple prediction models have been developed to predict hospital admission to emergency departments (EDs) to address overcrowding and patient safety, only a few studies have examined prediction models for prehospital use. Development of institution-specific prediction models is feasible in this age of data science, provided that predictor-related information is readily collectable.

objectiveWe aimed to develop a hospital admission prediction model based on patient information that is commonly available during ambulance transport before hospitalization.

methodsPatients transported by ambulance to our ED from April 2018 through March 2019 were enrolled. Candidate predictors were age, sex, chief complaint, vital signs, and patient medical history, all of which were recorded by emergency medical teams during ambulance transport. Patients were divided into two cohorts for derivation (3601/5145, 70.0%) and validation (1544/5145, 30.0%). For statistical models, logistic regression, logistic lasso, random forest, and gradient boosting machine were used. Prediction models were developed in the derivation cohort. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and association measures in the validation cohort.

resultsOf 5145 patients transported by ambulance, including deaths in the ED and hospital transfers, 2699 (52.5%) required hospital admission. Prediction performance was higher with the addition of predictive factors, attaining the best performance with an AUROC of 0.818 (95% CI 0.792-0.839) with a machine learning model and predictive factors of age, sex, chief complaint, and vital signs. Sensitivity and specificity of this model were 0.744 (95% CI 0.716-0.773) and 0.745 (95% CI 0.709-0.776), respectively.

conclusionsFor patients transferred to EDs, we developed a well-performing hospital admission prediction model based on routinely collected prehospital information including chief complaints.

Indexed as

data scienceemergency medicinehospital admissionmachine learningpredictionprehospital

Identifiers

PMID33107830
PMCPMC7655472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.