Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33107394›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Shortening Ambulance Response Time Increases Survival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Johan Holmén, Johan Herlitz, Sven-Erik Ricksten, Anneli Strömsöe, Eva Hagberg, Christer Axelsson, Araz Rawshani

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johan HolménDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Queen Silvia's Children's Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.
Johan HerlitzCentre for Prehospital Research Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare University of Borås Borås Sweden.
Sven-Erik RickstenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgSahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.
Anneli StrömsöeSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies Dalarna University Falun Sweden.
Eva HagbergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgSahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.
Christer AxelssonCentre for Prehospital Research Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare University of Borås Borås Sweden.
Araz RawshaniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgSahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Borås · SEDalarna University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The ambulance response time in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has doubled over the past 30 years in Sweden. At the same time, the chances of surviving an OHCA have increased substantially. A correct understanding of the effect of ambulance response time on the outcome after OHCA is fundamental for further advancement in cardiac arrest care. Methods and Results We used data from the SRCR (Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) to determine the effect of ambulance response time on 30-day survival after OHCA. We included 20 420 cases of OHCA occurring in Sweden between 2008 and 2017. Survival to 30 days was our primary outcome. Stratification and multiple logistic regression were used to control for confounding variables. In a model adjusted for age, sex, calendar year, and place of collapse, survival to 30 days is presented for 4 different groups of emergency medical services (EMS)-crew response time: 0 to 6 minutes, 7 to 9 minutes, 10 to 15 minutes, and >15 minutes. Survival to 30 days after a witnessed OHCA decreased as ambulance response time increased. For EMS response times of >10 minutes, the overall survival among those receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation before EMS arrival was slightly higher than survival for the sub-group of patients treated with compressions-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Conclusions Survival to 30 days after a witnessed OHCA decreases as ambulance response times increase. This correlation was seen independently of initial rhythm and whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed before EMS-crew arrival. Shortening EMS response times is likely to be a fast and effective way of increasing survival in OHCA.

Indexed as

AmbulancesTime-to-TreatmentAgedAged, 80 and overCardiopulmonary ResuscitationFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateSwedencardiac arrestcardiopulmonary resuscitationout‐of‐hospitalresponse time

Identifiers

PMID33107394
PMCPMC7763420
OpenAlexW3093544118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.