ArticleCancer medicine2021
Prognostic value of radiation interruption in different periods for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy era.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of reasons and risk factors for non-completion of radiotherapy courses in patients with tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Nutritional Prognosis of Patients Submitted to Radiotherapy and Its Implications in Treatment.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Lack of association between XRCC1 SNPs and acute radiation‑induced injury or prognosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2023Article
- Effect of radiotherapy interruption on nasopharyngeal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of radiation interruptions at different times on the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Totally, 4510 patients were identified from a well-established big-data intelligence platform. Optimal interruption thresholds were identified using Recursive partitioning analyses. Actuarial rates were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. Patients with preceding interruptions ≥1 d (5-year OS, 89.6% vs. 85.7%, p < 0.001; 5-year DFS, 81.4% vs. 76.4%, p < 0.001), or latter interruptions ≥4 d (88.4% vs. 82.3%, p < 0.001; 79.2% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.006) showed significant detrimental effects on OS and DFS than patients without those interruptions. However, no significant lower survival was identified in latter interruptions ≥1 d (5-year OS: 89.0% vs. 86.7%, p = 0.053; 5-year DFS, 80.2% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.080). Latter interruptions ≥4 d was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for OS (HR, 1.404; 95% CI, 1.143-1.723, p = 0.001) and DFS (HR, 1.351; 95% CI, 1.105-1.652, p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis. Radiation interruptions longer than 3 days that occurred in the latter period of treatment with IMRT were independent factors in poorer survival. Efforts are needed to minimize radiation interruptions and improve the timely provision of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.