Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33107146›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Combining inhomogeneous magnetization transfer and multipoint Dixon acquisition: Potential utility and evaluation.

Ece Ercan, Gopal Varma, Ivan E Dimitrov, Yin Xi, Marco C Pinho, Fang F Yu, Shu Zhang, Xinzeng Wang, Ananth J Madhuranthakam, Robert E Lenkinski and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ece ErcanDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8187-2075
Gopal VarmaDivision of MR Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Radiology, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7060-1982
Ivan E DimitrovAdvanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2686-6884
Yin XiDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9743-3010
Marco C PinhoDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4645-1638
Fang F YuDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-1331
Shu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-1977
Xinzeng WangDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0415-7246
Ananth J MadhuranthakamDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5524-7962
Robert E LenkinskiDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
David C AlsopDivision of MR Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Radiology, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8206-1995
Elena VinogradovDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4607-4147
Southwestern Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USGeneral Electric (Spain) · ESLeiden University Medical Center · NLPhilips (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe recently introduced inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) method has predominantly been applied for imaging the central nervous system. Future applications of ihMT, such as in peripheral nerves and muscles, will involve imaging in the vicinity of adipose tissues. This work aims to systematically investigate the partial volume effect of fat on the ihMT signal and to propose an efficient fat-separation method that does not interfere with ihMT measurements.

methodsFirst, the influence of fat on ihMT signal was studied using simulations. Next, the ihMT sequence was combined with a multi-echo Dixon acquisition for fat separation. The sequence was tested in 9 healthy volunteers using a 3T human scanner. The ihMT ratio (ihMTR) values were calculated in regions of interest in the brain and the spinal cord using standard acquisition (no fat saturation), water-only, in-phase, and out-of-phase reconstructions. The values obtained were compared with a standard fat suppression method, spectral presaturation with inversion recovery.

resultsSimulations showed variations in the ihMTR values in the presence of fat, depending on the TEs used. The IhMTR values in the brain and spinal cord derived from the water-only ihMT multi-echo Dixon images were in good agreement with values from the unsuppressed sequence. The ihMT-spectral presaturation with inversion recovery combination resulted in 24%-35% lower ihMTR values compared with the standard non-fat-suppressed acquisition.

conclusionThe presence of fat within a voxel affects the ihMTR calculations. The IhMT multi-echo Dixon method does not compromise the observable ihMT effect and can potentially be used to remove fat influence in ihMT.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdipose TissueHealthy VolunteersHumansSpinal Cordfat suppressionihMTmDixonmyelin imaging

Identifiers

PMID33107146
PMCPMC7821205
OpenAlexW3094451038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.