Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106993›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2021

Patient-reported functional executive challenges and caregiver confirmation in adult brain tumor survivors.

Nicole Cantisano, Philippe Menei, Vincent Roualdes, Romuald Seizeur, Philippe Allain, Didier Le Gall, Arnaud Roy, Mickaël Dinomais, Jérémy Besnard

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Posttreatment health interventions for adult cancer survivors and their families: an integrated review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole CantisanoCentre d'Etudes en Psychopathologie et Psychologie de la Santé (EA 7411), University of Toulouse Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France.
Philippe MeneiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Vincent RoualdesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Romuald SeizeurDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brest Regional University Hospital, Brest, France.
Philippe AllainDepartment of Neurology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Didier Le GallDepartment of Neurology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Arnaud RoyLaboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire (EA 4638), University of Angers, Angers, France.
Mickaël DinomaisDepartment of Pediatric Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Jérémy BesnardLaboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire (EA 4638), University of Angers, Angers, France. jeremy.besnard@univ-angers.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7127-7558
Laboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire · FRUniversité d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRNantes Université · FRUniversité Toulouse - Jean Jaurès · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe main objective of this study was to provide further information concerning the validity of patient-reported executive function (EF) in survivors of primary brain tumor (PBT) compared with a report provided by each patient's caregiver.

methodsForty survivors of PBT, 40 non-cancer controls and their proxies completed an assessment of functional executive disorders (e.g., planning, inhibition, shifting, action initiation). Comparisons of self and informant EF reports were examined, for both patients and non-cancer controls. The extent of the concordance between patients' reports and their caregivers' reports was also determined.

resultsPBT survivors and their caregivers reported more problems related to EF in contrast with the non-cancer comparison group (significant differences). There was a high level of agreement between patients' and caregivers' ratings within the patient group.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence suggesting that at an average of 3.67 (SD = 2.31) years following treatment for a PBT, EF difficulties are reported by patients and their caregivers. This study establishes a consistency between what is reported by survivors and what is reported by those who frequently interact with them. Further research investigating the link between these ratings and quality of life as well as other functions is encouraged. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This study's results demonstrate the importance of listening to PBT survivors' perception of EF difficulties. While not confirmed by neuropsychological evaluations, the functional executive challenges reported by these survivors' close relatives reflect what PBT survivors themselves report. Specialists should pay close attention to these difficulties to guarantee optimal post-cancer care.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCaregiversAdultHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSurvivorsBRIEF-A concordanceCancer survivorshipCognitive late effectsFunctional executive deficitsPrimary Brain Tumor (PBT)

Identifiers

PMID33106993
OpenAlexW3093692541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.