Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106985›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2021

Sickle cell trait newborn screen results: disclosure and management.

Margaret Lilley, Stephanie Hoang, Pamela Blumenschein, Ann-Marie Peturson, Iveta Sosova, Lauren Macneil, Ross Ridsdale, Susan Christian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Margaret LilleyNewborn Screening Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, 4B2.04 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada. Margaret.Lilley@albertaprecisionlabs.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1981-5851
Stephanie HoangNewborn Screening Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, 4B2.04 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7147-1916
Pamela BlumenscheinNewborn Screening Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, 4B2.04 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada.
Ann-Marie PetursonUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Iveta SosovaNewborn Screening Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, 4B2.04 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada.
Lauren MacneilNewborn Screening Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, 4B2.04 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada.
Ross RidsdaleNewborn Screening Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, 4B2.04 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada.
Susan ChristianNewborn Screening Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, 4B2.04 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-3049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the notification process of sickle cell trait (SCT) identified by newborn screening in Alberta. On April 1, 2019, Alberta began newborn screening for sickle cell disease (SCD) and elected to report sickle cell trait (SCT). For 1 year, healthcare providers (HCPs) were sent a questionnaire which addressed the perceived importance of disclosing the SCT results, whether HCPs felt competent in disclosing the result, knowledge of available resources, and comfort with coordinating and interpreting testing for the newborn's parents. As a control, we collected data from HCPs receiving positive cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screen results. A total of 107 out of 203 SCT questionnaires were returned and 41 of 66 CF questionnaires were returned. Respondents felt it was important that the results be shared with families (98% and 100%, respectively). Most respondents felt competent (SCT: 95%; CF: 85%), and willing to disclose the result to the family (SCT: 92%; CF: 88%). Fewer respondents were comfortable interpreting the results (SCT: 70%; CF: 51%)), and willing to arrange parental testing (SCT: 61%; CF: 59%). Family practitioners were significantly more willing to arrange SCT parental testing (88%) compared to pediatricians (40%) (OR = 5.3; CI 1.9, 15.4; p < 0.001). HCP comments revealed two themes: referral to another HCP for follow-up and identification of the primary HCP. Results support this disclosure process, and HCPs felt comfortable following up with SCT newborn screen results. The study identified challenges such as pediatricians being less comfortable ordering parental testing and the ordering HCP not always being the primary care provider.

Identifiers

PMID33106985
PMCPMC7846652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.