ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2021
Advantages and challenges for noninvasive atrial fibrillation ablation.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stereotactic Radiotherapy Ablation and Atrial Fibrillation: Technical Issues and Clinical Expectations Derived From a Systematic Review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Radiation therapy for ventricular arrhythmias.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2024Review
- When radiation meets the heart: Future of stereotactic body radiation therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023Article
- The state-of-the-art technic of stereotactic radioablation for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias: An overview.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation as a Novel Treatment Approach for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Facts and Limitations.Biomedicines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAlthough catheter ablation is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), risks remain and improved efficacy is desired. Stereotactic radiotherapy is a well-established therapy used to noninvasively treat malignancies with precision. We sought to evaluate stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) as a therapeutic option for treating AF. METHODS AND
resultsThree cancer patients with drug refractory AF were enrolled. Planning software using 3-D CT of the left atrium was used to design a desired ablation volume encompassing antral circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, roof and floor lines to create a "box" lesion set. After planning, patients were treated in the radioablation suite. STAR was able to deliver the intended radiation dose to the target in all 3 patients. No complications were observed over a follow-up period of 24 months. One patient with paroxysmal AF died from deterioration of cancer. The autopsy revealed evidence of fibroblasts and fibrogenesis in the region of atrial tissues targeted with radioablation. In one of these patients, left atrial posterior wall electrograms recorded from the esophagus before and 3 months after STAR indicated successful electrical isolation.
conclusionsThis is the first report of non-invasive radioablation of the left atrium with demonstration of successful electrical isolation. Although STAR may be safe and effective in delivering ablative energy to the left atrium, further evaluation is warranted regarding effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.