Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106932›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Age differences in anticipatory and executory mechanisms of gait initiation following unexpected balance perturbations.

Luca Laudani, Lorenzo Rum, Maria Stella Valle, Andrea Macaluso, Giuseppe Vannozzi, Antonino Casabona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Systematic review of candidate prognostic factors for falling in older adults identified from motion analysis of challenging walking tasks.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luca LaudaniCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK. llaudani@cardiffmet.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2638-3639
Lorenzo RumCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Maria Stella ValleDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Andrea MacalusoDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe VannozziDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Antonino CasabonaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn age-related decline in anticipatory postural mechanisms has been reported during gait initiation; however, it is unclear whether such decline may jeopardize whole-body stability following unexpected balance perturbations. This study aimed to compare young and older individuals' ability to generate postural responses and preserve stability in response to external waist perturbations delivered within gait initiation.

methodsTen young and ten older participants performed 10 gait initiation trials followed by 48 unperturbed and 12 perturbed trials in a random order. A stereophotogrammetric system and three force platforms were used to quantify mechanical parameters from the preparatory phase (e.g., timing and amplitude of postural adjustments) and from the stepping phase (e.g., step characteristics and dynamic stability). Activation patterns of lower leg muscles were determined by surface electromyography.

resultsOlder participants responded to perturbation with lower increase in both magnitude (p < 0.001; η

conclusionThe results suggest that young participants took more time than older to adjust the anticipatory biomechanical response to perturbation attempting to preserve balance during stepping. In contrast, older adults were unable to modify their anticipatory adjustments in response to perturbation and mainly relied on compensatory mechanisms attempting to preserve stability via a more cautious stepping strategy.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAgedAgingBiomechanical PhenomenaCognitionElectromyographyFemaleGaitHumansLegMaleMuscle, SkeletalPostural BalancePostureElderlyElectromyographyFall riskLocomotionPostureSpatiotemporal analysis

Identifiers

PMID33106932
PMCPMC7862204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.