ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2021
Noscapine alleviates cerebral damage in ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Skimmianine Showed Neuroprotection against Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Inhibition of Myeloperoxidase Pro-Fibrotic Effect by Noscapine in Equine Endometrium.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Oxysophoridine protects against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury via inhibition of TLR4/p38MAPK‑mediated ferroptosis.Molecular medicine reports · 2023Article
- Attenuation Effect of Salvianolic Acid B on Testicular Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- The Ameliorative Role ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With high unmet medical needs, stroke remains an intensely focused research area. Although noscapine is a neuroprotective agent, its mechanism of action in ischemic-reperfusion (I-R) injury is yet to be ascertained. We investigated the effect of noscapine on the molecular mechanisms of cell damage using yeast, and its neuroprotection on cerebral I-R injury in rats. Yeast, both wild-type and Δtrx2 strains, was evaluated for cell growth and viability, and oxidative stress to assess the noscapine effect at 8, 10, 12, and 20 μg/ml concentrations. The neuroprotective activity of noscapine (5 and 10 mg/kg; po for 8 days) was investigated in rats using middle cerebral artery occlusion-induced I-R injury. Infarct volume, neurological deficit, oxidative stress, myeloperoxidase activity, and histological alterations were determined in I-R rats. In vitro yeast assays exhibited significant antioxidant activity and enhanced cell tolerance against oxidative stress after noscapine treatment. Similarly, noscapine pretreatment significantly reduced infarct volume and edema in the brain. The neurological deficit was decreased and oxidative stress biomarkers, superoxide dismutase activity and glutathione levels, were significantly increased while lipid peroxidation showed significant decrease in comparison to vehicle-treated I-R rats. Myeloperoxidase activity, an indicator of inflammation, was also reduced significantly in treated rats; histological changes were attenuated with noscapine. The study demonstrates the protective effect of noscapine in yeast and I-R rats by improving cell viability and attenuating neuronal damage, respectively. This protective activity of noscapine could be attributed to potent free radical scavenging and inhibition of inflammation in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.