Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106871›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2021

Differential Effects of Sulfur Amino Acid-Restricted and Low-Calorie Diets on Gut Microbiome Profile and Bile Acid Composition in Male C57BL6/J Mice.

Sailendra N Nichenametla, Dwight A L Mattocks, Vishal Midya, Jelena Shneyder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A "Gut Feeling" to Create a 10th Hallmark of Aging.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sailendra N NichenametlaAnimal Science Laboratory, Orentreich Foundation for the Advancement of Science, Cold Spring-on-Hudson, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5969-3572
Dwight A L MattocksAnimal Science Laboratory, Orentreich Foundation for the Advancement of Science, Cold Spring-on-Hudson, New York.
Vishal MidyaDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Jelena ShneyderAnimal Science Laboratory, Orentreich Foundation for the Advancement of Science, Cold Spring-on-Hudson, New York.

Funding

Stable Isotope and Metabolomics CoreP60DK020541 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI PESSIN, JEFFREY E. · 1986 to 2014
$29.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020541NIH HHS P60DK020541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet can affect health and longevity by altering the gut microbiome profile. Sulfur amino acid restriction (SAAR), like caloric restriction, extends lifespan. But, its effect on the gut microbiome profile and functional significance of such effects are understudied. We investigated whether SAAR alters the gut microbiome profile and bile acid composition, an index of microbial metabolism. We also compared these changes with those induced by a 12% low-calorie diet (LCD). Male 21-week-old C57BL6/J mice were fed control (CD; 0.86% methionine), SAAR (0.12% methionine), and LCD diets (0.86% methionine). After 10 weeks on the diet, plasma markers and fecal microbial profiles were determined. SAAR mice had lower body weights and IGF-1, and higher food intake and FGF-21 than CD mice. Compared to SAAR mice, LCD mice had higher body weights, and lower FGF-21 and food intake, but similar IGF-1. β-Diversity indices were different between SAAR and LCD, and LCD and CD, but not between CD and SAAR. In groupwise comparisons of individual taxa, differences were more discernable between SAAR and LCD than between other groups. Abundances of Firmicutes, Clostridiaceae, and Turicibacteraceae were higher, but Verrucomicrobia was lower in SAAR than in LCD. Secondary bile acids and the ratio of secondary to primary bile acids were lower in SAAR than in LCD. SAAR favored bile acid conjugation with glycine at the expense of taurine. Overall, SAAR and LCD diets induced distinct changes in the gut microbiome and bile acid profiles. Additional studies on the role of these changes in improving health and lifespan are warranted.

Indexed as

Amino Acids, SulfurCaloric RestrictionGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBile Acids and SaltsBody WeightInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleMethionineMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAmino Acids, SulfurBile Acids and SaltsInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMethionineClostridialesFirmicutesLifespanMethionine restrictionSulfur metabolism

Identifiers

PMID33106871
PMCPMC8514071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.