Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106856›Full record

ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2020

Cognitive Assessment via Telephone: A Scoping Review of Instruments.

Anne R Carlew, Hudaisa Fatima, Julia R Livingstone, Caitlin Reese, Laura Lacritz, Cody Pendergrass, Kenneth Chase Bailey, Chase Presley, Ben Mokhtari, Colin Munro Cullum

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Operationalizing Alzheimer's disease trials in the era of targeted therapies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  5. The cost of dementia in the United States in 2026.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The burden of cognitive impairment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Cognitive dysfunction, psychiatric distress, and functional decline after liver transplantation.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Rates and Predictors of Performance Validity Test Failure in Adults Treated for Post-COVID-19 Condition: a Brief Report.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. User Experience of a (Semi-) Automated Cognitive Phone-Based Assessment Within a Memory Clinic Population.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anne R CarlewDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Hudaisa FatimaDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Julia R LivingstoneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Caitlin ReeseDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Laura LacritzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Cody PendergrassMental Health Department, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX 75216, USA.
Kenneth Chase BaileyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Chase PresleyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Ben MokhtariDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Colin Munro CullumDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTelephone-based cognitive assessment (TBCA) has long been studied but less widely adopted in routine neuropsychological practice. Increased interest in remote neuropsychological assessment techniques in the face of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic warrants an updated review of relevant remote assessment literature. While recent reviews of videoconference-based neuropsychological applications have been published, no updated compilation of empirical TBCA research has been completed. Therefore, this scoping review offers relevant empirical research to inform clinical decision-making specific to teleneuropsychology.

methodPeer-reviewed studies addressing TBCA were included. Broad search terms were related to telephone, cognitive, or neuropsychological assessment and screening. After systematic searching of the PubMed and EBSCO databases, 139 relevant articles were retained.

resultsIn total, 17 unique cognitive screening measures, 20 cognitive batteries, and 6 single-task measures were identified as being developed or adapted specifically for telephone administration. Tables summarizing the identified cognitive assessments, information on diagnostic accuracy, and comparisons to face-to-face cognitive assessment are included in supplementary materials.

conclusionsOverall, literature suggests that TBCA is a viable modality for identifying cognitive impairment in various populations. However, the mode of assessment selected clinically should reflect an understanding of the purpose, evidence, and limitations for various tests and populations. Most identified measures were developed for research application to support gross cognitive characterization and to help determine when more comprehensive testing was needed. While TBCA is not meant to replace gold-standard, face-to-face evaluation, if appropriately utilized, it can expand scope of practice, particularly when barriers to standard neuropsychological assessment occur.

Indexed as

TelephoneCognitionCOVID-19HumansNeuropsychological TestsCognitive assessmentNeuropsychological assessmentTelehealthTeleneuropsychologyTelephone

Identifiers

PMID33106856
PMCPMC7665291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.