Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106602›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2021

Timing the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity with ancient duplications.

Julian Vosseberg, Jolien J E van Hooff, Marina Marcet-Houben, Anne van Vlimmeren, Leny M van Wijk, Toni Gabaldón, Berend Snel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Divergent evolution of the PRPS enzymes across the tree of life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Eukaryogenesis From FECA to LECA: Radical Steps Along the Way.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DPANN Archaea and CPR Bacteria: insights into early cellular evolution?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Mitochondria - the CEO of the cell.Journal of cell science · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Julian Vosseberg *Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3105-9414
Jolien J E van Hooff *Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8754-1894
Marina Marcet-HoubenCentre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Anne van VlimmerenTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0379-4945
Leny M van WijkTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-9368
Toni GabaldónCentre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain. toni.gabaldon@bsc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0019-1735
Berend SnelTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. b.snel@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5804-8547
Utrecht University · NLBarcelona Supercomputing Center · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

European Research Council 724173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryogenesis is one of the most enigmatic evolutionary transitions, during which simple prokaryotic cells gave rise to complex eukaryotic cells. While evolutionary intermediates are lacking, gene duplications provide information on the order of events by which eukaryotes originated. Here we use a phylogenomics approach to reconstruct successive steps during eukaryogenesis. We find that gene duplications roughly doubled the proto-eukaryotic gene repertoire, with families inherited from the Asgard archaea-related host being duplicated most. By relatively timing events using phylogenetic distances, we inferred that duplications in cytoskeletal and membrane-trafficking families were among the earliest events, whereas most other families expanded predominantly after mitochondrial endosymbiosis. Altogether, we infer that the host that engulfed the proto-mitochondrion had some eukaryote-like complexity, which drastically increased upon mitochondrial acquisition. This scenario bridges the signs of complexity observed in Asgard archaeal genomes to the proposed role of mitochondria in triggering eukaryogenesis.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEukaryotic CellsArchaeaEukaryotaHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID33106602
PMCPMC7610411
OpenAlexW3093560393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.