Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106524›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Morphological and physiological responses of two willow species from different habitats to salt stress.

Shuang Feng, Lulu Ren, Hongwei Sun, Kun Qiao, Shenkui Liu, Aimin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanistic Insights into the Abiotic Stress Adaptation ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Characterization of the NaPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuang FengKey Laboratory of Saline-Alkali Vegetation Ecology Restoration (Northeast Forestry University), Ministry of Education, Harbin, 150040, China.
Lulu RenCollege of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
Hongwei SunCollege of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
Kun QiaoCollege of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
Shenkui LiuThe State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Lin'An, Zhejiang, 311300, China. shenkuiliu@nefu.edu.cn.
Aimin ZhouCollege of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China. aiminzhou@neau.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6469-6279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant salt tolerance is a complex mechanism, and different plant species have different strategies for surviving salt stress. In the present study, we analyzed and compared the morphological and physiological responses of two willow species (Salix linearistipularis and Salix matsudana) from different habitats to salt stress. S. linearistipularis exhibited higher seed germination rates and seedling root Na

Indexed as

EcosystemPhotosynthesisSalt StressPlant LeavesPlant RootsSalixSalt-Tolerant PlantsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID33106524
PMCPMC7588438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.