Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106518›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The spectral sensitivity of Drosophila photoreceptors.

Camilla R Sharkey, Jorge Blanco, Maya M Leibowitz, Daniel Pinto-Benito, Trevor J Wardill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A millisecond parameter space for phase-shifting the circadian pacemaker with near-ultraviolet light.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Spectral preferences of mosquitos are altered by odors.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camilla R SharkeyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA. camilla.r.sharkey@gmail.com.
Jorge BlancoDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Maya M LeibowitzDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK.
Daniel Pinto-BenitoDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK.
Trevor J WardillDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA. twardill@umn.edu.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L024667/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster has long been a popular model insect species, due in large part to the availability of genetic tools and is fast becoming the model for insect colour vision. Key to understanding colour reception in Drosophila is in-depth knowledge of spectral inputs and downstream neural processing. While recent studies have sparked renewed interest in colour processing in Drosophila, photoreceptor spectral sensitivity measurements have yet to be carried out in vivo. We have fully characterised the spectral input to the motion and colour vision pathways, and directly measured the effects of spectral modulating factors, screening pigment density and carotenoid-based ocular pigments. All receptor sensitivities had significant shifts in spectral sensitivity compared to previous measurements. Notably, the spectral range of the Rh6 visual pigment is substantially broadened and its peak sensitivity is shifted by 92 nm from 508 to 600 nm. We show that this deviation can be explained by transmission of long wavelengths through the red screening pigment and by the presence of the blue-absorbing filter in the R7y receptors. Further, we tested direct interactions between inner and outer photoreceptors using selective recovery of activity in photoreceptor pairs.

Indexed as

AnimalsColor PerceptionDrosophila melanogasterEyePhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateRetinal PigmentsVision, OcularRetinal Pigments

Identifiers

PMID33106518
PMCPMC7588446
OpenAlexW3093848977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.