Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106478›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

E-cadherin focuses protrusion formation at the front of migrating cells by impeding actin flow.

Cecilia Grimaldi, Isabel Schumacher, Aleix Boquet-Pujadas, Katsiaryna Tarbashevich, Bart Eduard Vos, Jan Bandemer, Jan Schick, Anne Aalto, Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin, Timo Betz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Harnessing the Power ofCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Chemical and Mechanical Regulation of Leukocyte Migration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Physical principles and mechanisms of cell migration.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cecilia GrimaldiInstitute of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Isabel SchumacherInstitute of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Aleix Boquet-PujadasInstitut Pasteur, Bioimage Analysis Unit, 75105, Paris, France.
Katsiaryna TarbashevichInstitute of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Bart Eduard VosInstitute of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4325-6298
Jan BandemerInstitute of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Jan SchickInstitute of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Anne AaltoInstitute of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Jean-Christophe Olivo-MarinInstitut Pasteur, Bioimage Analysis Unit, 75105, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6796-0696
Timo BetzInstitute of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1548-0655
Erez RazInstitute of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany. erez.raz@uni-muenster.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-3302
University of Münster · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The migration of many cell types relies on the formation of actomyosin-dependent protrusions called blebs, but the mechanisms responsible for focusing this kind of protrusive activity to the cell front are largely unknown. Here, we employ zebrafish primordial germ cells (PGCs) as a model to study the role of cell-cell adhesion in bleb-driven single-cell migration in vivo. Utilizing a range of genetic, reverse genetic and mathematical tools, we define a previously unknown role for E-cadherin in confining bleb-type protrusions to the leading edge of the cell. We show that E-cadherin-mediated frictional forces impede the backwards flow of actomyosin-rich structures that define the domain where protrusions are preferentially generated. In this way, E-cadherin confines the bleb-forming region to a restricted area at the cell front and reinforces the front-rear axis of migrating cells. Accordingly, when E-cadherin activity is reduced, the bleb-forming area expands, thus compromising the directional persistence of the cells.

Indexed as

Cell MovementActinsActomyosinAnimalsCadherinsFemaleGerm CellsMalePseudopodiaZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsActinsActomyosinCadherinsZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33106478
PMCPMC7588466
OpenAlexW3094521351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.