ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
Evidence for an effector-independent action system from people born without hands.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abstract Representation of Movement Parameters in Basal Ganglia Output.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Motor equivalence in motor awareness.iScience · 2026Article
- Global remapping of the sensory homunculus emerges early in childhood development.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Coding of tool use independent of body part.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Action-type mapping principles extend beyond evolutionarily conserved actions, even in people born without hands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Centering cognitive neuroscience on task demands and generalization.Nature neuroscience · 2024Review
- Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.Psychological research · 2024Review
- Effector-selective modulation of the effective connectivity within frontoparietal circuits during visuomotor tasks.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Language and developmental plasticity after perinatal stroke.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Anterograde interference emerges along a gradient as a function of task similarity: A behavioural study.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Unraveling somatotopic organization in the human brain using machine learning and adaptive supervoxel-based parcellations.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Transforming abstract plans into concrete actions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many parts of the visuomotor system guide daily hand actions, like reaching for and grasping objects. Do these regions depend exclusively on the hand as a specific body part whose movement they guide, or are they organized for the reaching task per se, for any body part used as an effector? To address this question, we conducted a neuroimaging study with people born without upper limbs-individuals with dysplasia-who use the feet to act, as they and typically developed controls performed reaching and grasping actions with their dominant effector. Individuals with dysplasia have no prior experience acting with hands, allowing us to control for hand motor imagery when acting with another effector (i.e., foot). Primary sensorimotor cortices showed selectivity for the hand in controls and foot in individuals with dysplasia. Importantly, we found a preference based on action type (reaching/grasping) regardless of the effector used in the association sensorimotor cortex, in the left intraparietal sulcus and dorsal premotor cortex, as well as in the basal ganglia and anterior cerebellum. These areas also showed differential response patterns between action types for both groups. Intermediate areas along a posterior-anterior gradient in the left dorsal premotor cortex gradually transitioned from selectivity based on the body part to selectivity based on the action type. These findings indicate that some visuomotor association areas are organized based on abstract action functions independent of specific sensorimotor parameters, paralleling sensory feature-independence in visual and auditory cortices in people born blind and deaf. Together, they suggest association cortices across action and perception may support specific computations, abstracted from low-level sensorimotor elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.