Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106395›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Evidence for an effector-independent action system from people born without hands.

Yuqi Liu, Gilles Vannuscorps, Alfonso Caramazza, Ella Striem-Amit

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Abstract Representation of Movement Parameters in Basal Ganglia Output.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Coding of tool use independent of body part.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Action-type mapping principles extend beyond evolutionarily conserved actions, even in people born without hands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Language and developmental plasticity after perinatal stroke.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transforming abstract plans into concrete actions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuqi LiuDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057; yl1179@georgetown.edu Ella.StriemAmit@georgetown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6699-5982
Gilles VannuscorpsDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0001-5686-7349
Alfonso CaramazzaDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Ella Striem-AmitDepartment of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057; yl1179@georgetown.edu Ella.StriemAmit@georgetown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5900-3455
Harvard University · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many parts of the visuomotor system guide daily hand actions, like reaching for and grasping objects. Do these regions depend exclusively on the hand as a specific body part whose movement they guide, or are they organized for the reaching task per se, for any body part used as an effector? To address this question, we conducted a neuroimaging study with people born without upper limbs-individuals with dysplasia-who use the feet to act, as they and typically developed controls performed reaching and grasping actions with their dominant effector. Individuals with dysplasia have no prior experience acting with hands, allowing us to control for hand motor imagery when acting with another effector (i.e., foot). Primary sensorimotor cortices showed selectivity for the hand in controls and foot in individuals with dysplasia. Importantly, we found a preference based on action type (reaching/grasping) regardless of the effector used in the association sensorimotor cortex, in the left intraparietal sulcus and dorsal premotor cortex, as well as in the basal ganglia and anterior cerebellum. These areas also showed differential response patterns between action types for both groups. Intermediate areas along a posterior-anterior gradient in the left dorsal premotor cortex gradually transitioned from selectivity based on the body part to selectivity based on the action type. These findings indicate that some visuomotor association areas are organized based on abstract action functions independent of specific sensorimotor parameters, paralleling sensory feature-independence in visual and auditory cortices in people born blind and deaf. Together, they suggest association cortices across action and perception may support specific computations, abstracted from low-level sensorimotor elements.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingFootFunctional LateralityHandHand StrengthHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotor CortexMovementNeuronal PlasticityParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceSensorimotor Cortexactionsbrain developmenthandsmotor cortexplasticity

Identifiers

PMID33106395
PMCPMC7668009
OpenAlexW3094084825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.