Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33106172›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2020

How important are parents in the development of child anxiety and depression? A genomic analysis of parent-offspring trios in the Norwegian Mother Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa).

Rosa Cheesman, Espen Moen Eilertsen, Yasmin I Ahmadzadeh, Line C Gjerde, Laurie J Hannigan, Alexandra Havdahl, Alexander I Young, Thalia C Eley, Pål R Njølstad, Per Magnus and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-wide Association Meta-analysis of Childhood and Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Association analysis between genetic nurturing effects ofBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Rosa CheesmanSocial Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. rosa.cheesman@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6543-0402
Espen Moen EilertsenDepartment of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Yasmin I AhmadzadehSocial Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Line C GjerdeDepartment of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Laurie J HanniganNic Waals Institute at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Alexandra HavdahlDepartment of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Alexander I YoungSocial Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Thalia C EleySocial Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Pål R NjølstadCenter of Diabetes Research, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Per MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Ole A AndreassenNORMENT Centre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eivind YstromDepartment of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Tom A McAdamsSocial Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOKing's College London · GBHaukeland University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

ERC 293574Helse Vest 911745Horizon 2020 847776Norwegian Research Council 223273Norwegian Research Council 229624Norwegian Research Council 240413/F20Norwegian Research Council 248778Norwegian Research Council 262177Norwegian Research Council 273291Norwegian Research Council 288083Novo Nordisk Foundation 54741South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority 2018058South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority 2018059UK Medical Research Council MR/M021475/1Wellcome Trust 107706/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies detect associations between parent behaviour and child symptoms of anxiety and depression. Despite knowledge that anxiety and depression are influenced by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental risk factors, most studies do not account for shared familial genetic risk. Quantitative genetic designs provide a means of controlling for shared genetics, but rely on observed putative exposure variables, and require data from highly specific family structures.

methodsThe intergenerational genomic method, Relatedness Disequilibrium Regression (RDR), indexes environmental effects of parents on child traits using measured genotypes. RDR estimates how much the parent genome influences the child indirectly via the environment, over and above effects of genetic factors acting directly in the child. This 'genetic nurture' effect is agnostic to parent phenotype and captures unmeasured heritable parent behaviours. We applied RDR in a sample of 11,598 parent-offspring trios from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) to estimate parental genetic nurture separately from direct child genetic effects on anxiety and depression symptoms at age 8. We tested for mediation of genetic nurture via maternal anxiety and depression symptoms. Results were compared to a complementary non-genomic pedigree model.

resultsParental genetic nurture explained 14% of the variance in depression symptoms at age 8. Subsequent analyses suggested that maternal anxiety and depression partially mediated this effect. The genetic nurture effect was mirrored by the finding of family environmental influence in our pedigree model. In contrast, variance in anxiety symptoms was not significantly influenced by common genetic variation in children or parents, despite a moderate pedigree heritability.

conclusionsGenomic methods like RDR represent new opportunities for genetically sensitive family research on complex human traits, which until now has been largely confined to adoption, twin and other pedigree designs. Our results are relevant to debates about the role of parents in the development of anxiety and depression in children, and possibly where to intervene to reduce problems.

Indexed as

AnxietyCohort StudiesDepressionFathersFemaleGenomicsGenotypeHumansMaleMothersNorwayRisk FactorsAnxietyChildrenDepressionEnvironmentGenetic nurtureGenomicsMoBa

Identifiers

PMID33106172
PMCPMC7590735
OpenAlexW3093753350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.