Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33105971›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022

Adoption of Preventive Behaviour Strategies and Public Perceptions About COVID-19 in Singapore.

Semra Ozdemir, Sean Ng, Isha Chaudhry, Eric Andrew Finkelstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Moral Foundations of Vaccine Passports.Journal of business ethics : JBE · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Semra OzdemirSignature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7556-1601
Sean NgSignature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8406-2388
Isha ChaudhrySignature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-7399
Eric Andrew FinkelsteinSignature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6443-9686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe unprecedented severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) constitutes a serious public health concern. However, adoption of COVID-19-related preventive behaviours remain relatively unknown. This study investigated predictors of preventive behaviours.

methodsAn analytical sample of 897 Singaporean adults who were quota sampled based on age, gender, and ethnicity were recruited through a web-enabled survey. Outcomes were adoption of, or increased frequency of preventive behaviours (avoiding social events; avoiding public transport; reducing time spent shopping and eating out; wearing a mask in public; avoiding hospitals/clinics; keeping children out of school, washing hands/using sanitisers; keeping surroundings clean; avoiding touching public surfaces; working from/studying at home). Public perceptions regarding COVID-19 (chances of getting COVID-19; perceived likelihood of COVID-19-related intensive care unit (ICU) admission; government trust; self-efficacy; perceived appropriateness of COVID-19 behaviours; response efficacy), anxiety, and demographic characteristics (age; ethnicity; marital status; education; chronic conditions; current living arrangements) were investigated as predictors of preventive behaviours adopted during COVID-19 in binomial and ordered logistic regressions.

resultsThough adoption of preventive behaviours among Singaporeans varied, it was, overall, high, and consistent with government recommendations. Nearly a quarter reported moderate to severe anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder 7-item - GAD-7 scores). Respondents who perceived higher COVID-19 risks, had higher government trust, higher self-efficacy, and perceived that others acted appropriately reported increased adoption/frequency of preventive measures. The strongest indicator of behavioural change was response efficacy. Respondents who were older, highly educated, anxious and married reported higher adoption/frequency of preventive measures.

conclusionTo successfully influence appropriate preventive behaviours, public health messages should highlight response efficacy, increase self-efficacy, and promote trust in governmental response. Focus should be on demographic segments with low adoptions, such as younger individuals and those with low education.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultChildGovernmentHumansPublic OpinionSingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesCoronavirusCOVID-19Preventive Behaviour UptakePublic PerceptionsSARS-CoV-2Singapore

Identifiers

PMID33105971
PMCPMC9309921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.