Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33105803›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Target and Suspect HRMS Metabolomics for the Determination of Functional Ingredients in 13 Varieties of Olive Leaves and Drupes from Greece.

Evangelia Kritikou, Natasa P Kalogiouri, Lydia Kolyvira, Nikolaos S Thomaidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Protective Effects ofToxics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Comparative Analysis of Chemical Composition ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of Geraniol and Geraniol Nanoemulsions onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characterization of the Phenolic Fingerprint ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Evangelia KritikouLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zographou, 15771 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3455-2108
Natasa P KalogiouriLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zographou, 15771 Athens, Greece.
Lydia KolyviraLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zographou, 15771 Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos S ThomaidisLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zographou, 15771 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-4735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The huge interest in the health-related properties of foods to improve health has brought about the development of sensitive analytical methods for the characterization of natural products with functional ingredients. Greek olive leaves and drupes constitute a valuable source of biophenols with functional properties. A novel ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time of flight tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF-MS) analytical method was developed to identify biophenols through target and suspect screening in Greek olive leaves and drupes of the varieties: Koroneiki, Throumbolia, Konservolia, Koutsourelia, Kalamon, Petrolia, Amigdalolia, Megaritiki, Mastoeidis, Agouromanakolia, Agrilia, Adramitiani and Kolovi. The method's performance was evaluated using the target compounds: oleuropein, tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol. The analytes demonstrated satisfactory recovery efficiency for both leaves (85.9-90.5%) and drupes (89.7-92.5%). Limits of detection (LODs) were relatively low over the range 0.038 (oleuropein)-0.046 (hydroxytyrosol) and 0.037 (oleuropein)-0.048 (hydroxytyrosol) for leaves and drupes, respectively For leaves, the precision limit ranged between 4.7 and 5.8% for intra-day and between 5.8 and 6.5% for inter-day experiments, and for drupes, it ranged between 3.8 and 5.2% for intra-day and between 5.1 and 6.2% for inter-day experiments, establishing the good precision of the method. The regression coefficient (r

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidGeographyGreeceHot TemperatureIridoid GlucosidesIridoidsLimit of DetectionMetabolomicsOleaPhenylethyl AlcoholPlant ExtractsPlant LeavesReproducibility of ResultsSeasonsSeedsTandem Mass Spectrometry3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol4-hydroxyphenylethanolIridoid GlucosidesIridoidsoleuropeinPhenylethyl AlcoholPlant ExtractsbiomarkersdrupesGreekLC-QTOF-MSmetabolomicsoleuropeinolive leavesphenolicssuspect

Identifiers

PMID33105803
PMCPMC7660111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.