Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33105661›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

A Preliminary Study on Machine Learning-Based Evaluation of Static and Dynamic FET-PET for the Detection of Pseudoprogression in Patients with IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma.

Sied Kebir, Teresa Schmidt, Matthias Weber, Lazaros Lazaridis, Norbert Galldiks, Karl-Josef Langen, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Elke Hattingen, Ulrich Herrlinger, Philipp Lohmann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cancers · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Digital Case Manager-A Data-Driven Tool to Support Family Caregivers with Initial Guidance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sied KebirDepartment of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0678-5852
Teresa SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany.
Matthias WeberDivision of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.
Lazaros LazaridisDepartment of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany.
Norbert GalldiksDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, D-50937 Cologne, Germany.
Karl-Josef LangenInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, D-52428 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1101-5075
Christoph KleinschnitzDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany.
Elke HattingenInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, D-60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
Ulrich HerrlingerDivision of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.
Philipp LohmannInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, D-52428 Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5360-046X
Martin GlasDepartment of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudoprogression (PSP) detection in glioblastoma remains challenging and has important clinical implications. We investigated the potential of machine learning (ML) in improving the performance of PET using O-(2-[

Indexed as

amino acid PETartificial intelligencegliomatreatment-related changestumor progression

Identifiers

PMID33105661
PMCPMC7690380
OpenAlexW3093642463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.