Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33105640›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Efficacy of Oxyclozanide and Closantel against Rumen Flukes (Paramphistomidae) in Naturally Infected Sheep.

David García-Dios, Pablo Díaz, Miguel Viña, Susana Remesar, Alberto Prieto, Gonzalo López-Lorenzo, Jose Manuel Díaz Cao, Rosario Panadero, Pablo Díez-Baños, Ceferino Manuel López

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Amphistomes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David García-DiosInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.
Pablo DíazInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2445-1095
Miguel ViñaInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.
Susana RemesarInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.
Alberto PrietoInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.
Gonzalo López-LorenzoInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.
Jose Manuel Díaz CaoInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.
Rosario PanaderoInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.
Pablo Díez-BañosInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.
Ceferino Manuel LópezInvestigación en Sanidad Animal: Galicia (Grupo INVESAGA), Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela), 27002 Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9151-3180
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

xunta de galicia 2017-PG117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paramphistomosis is considered an emergent disease of ruminants in Europe. Some drugs have been found effective for treating paramphistomid infections in cattle, but data in sheep are currently limited. Thus, faecal samples from 25 adult sheep naturally infected with paramphistomids were collected weekly to test the efficacy of oxyclozanide and closantel. Three groups were performed: nine animals orally treated with a single dose of oxyclozanide (15 mg/kg bodyweight (BW) integrated the G-OXI group, whereas eight sheep orally treated with a single dose of closantel (10 mg/kg BW) were placed in a group called G-CLS. Eight untreated controls constituted the group G-CON. Oxyclozanide showed efficacies up to 90% until week 11 post-treatment, with a maximum efficacy of 98.3%, and significant differences were found between G-OXI and G-CON until the 26th week post-treatment. Closantel was insufficiently active (0-81%) throughout the study and differences compared to G-CON were never found. The present study reveals that oxyclozanide given at a single oral dose of 15 mg/kg BW is highly effective against adult rumen flukes in sheep. In addition, the use of a single oral dose of closantel at 10 mg/kg BW is not recommended for treating paramphistomid infections in sheep.

Indexed as

closantelefficacyoxyclozanideparamphistomidaesheep

Identifiers

PMID33105640
PMCPMC7690378
OpenAlexW3093921992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.