ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimization for Reducing Energy Consumption and Improving Surface Quality during Dry Machining of 304 Stainless Steel.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation and Improvement of Greenness for Milling AL6061 Alloy through Life Cycle Assessment and Grey Relational Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cutting quality and production cleanliness are main aspects to be considered in the machining process, and determining the optimal cutting parameters is a significant measure to reduce energy consumption and optimize surface quality. In this paper, 304 stainless steel is adopted as the research objective. The regression models of the specific cutting energy, surface roughness, and microhardness are constructed and the inherent influence mechanism between cutting parameters and output responses are analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The desirability analysis method is introduced to perform the multi-objective optimization for low energy consumption (LEC) mode and low surface roughness (LSR) mode. Optimal combination of process parameters with composite desirability of 0.925 and 0.899 are obtained in such two modes respectively. As indicated by the results of multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), genetic algorithm (GA) combined with weighted-sum-type objective function and experiment, the relative deviation values are within 10%. Moreover, the results also reveal that the feed rate is the most significant factor affecting the three responses, while the correlation of cutting depth is less noticeable. The effect of low feed rate on microhardness is primarily related to the mechanical load caused by extrusion, and the influence at high feed rate is determined by plastic deformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.