ReviewJournal of cardiovascular pharmacology2020
Role of Stem Cell-Derived Microvesicles in Cardiovascular Disease.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanoparticles For Rescue: Innovative Therapeutic Strategy For Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Review
- Bio-Inspired Nanocarriers Derived from Stem Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles for Targeted Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Extracellular Vesicles and Ischemic Cardiovascular Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Bioengineering Extracellular Vesicles for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases.Advanced biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The role of stem cells in augmenting reparative processes in the heart after ischemic injury has been successfully demonstrated in small and large animal models. However, the outcomes of cell therapy in clinical trials have been somewhat variable, with overall effects of autologous stem cell therapies demonstrating a modest improvement in cardiac structure and function. How stem cells repair the heart after cardiac injury is still not well understood. Most recent studies suggest that adult derived stem cells act primarily through paracrine signaling to exert beneficial effects, including modulation of immune response, stimulation of new blood vessel formation, or by inducing mature myocytes to transiently reenter the cell cycle, rather than robust direct differentiation of the transplanted cells into myocytes. In addition, data from multiple laboratory results confirmed clearance of stem cells themselves within a few days still leading to functional benefits further confirming the role of paracrine signaling in augmenting cardiac reparative processes rather than direct differentiation of cells. These findings rapidly evolved the field of extracellular vesicles specifically microvesicles (MVs) as they are active hubs of autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine signaling targeting different biological processes. The beneficial effects seen after stem cell transplantation could be linked to the cardioprotective factors packaged in the MVs secreted from stem cells. Therefore, stem cell MVs provide a new avenue for the treatment of cardiovascular disease through a multitude of mechanisms including cellular communication within the stem cell niches, delivery of genetic information, regulation of the immune system in the heart, and stimulation of angiogenesis which will be discussed in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.