Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33105077›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2020

Ion Mobility Spectrometry with High Ion Utilization Efficiency Using Traveling Wave-Based Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations.

Ailin Li, Gabe Nagy, Christopher R Conant, Randolph V Norheim, Joon Yong Lee, Cameron Giberson, Adam L Hollerbach, Venkateshkumar Prabhakaran, Isaac K Attah, Christopher D Chouinard and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification ofThe Analyst · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ailin LiBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Gabe NagyBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9007-4422
Christopher R ConantBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Randolph V NorheimEnvironmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Joon Yong LeeBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5864-8518
Cameron GibersonBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Adam L HollerbachBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Venkateshkumar PrabhakaranPhysical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6692-6488
Isaac K AttahBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Christopher D ChouinardBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1416-1812
Aneesh PrabhakaranBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Richard D SmithBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2381-2349
Yehia M IbrahimBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6085-193X
Sandilya V B GarimellaBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-9842
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory · US

Funding

Equipment Supplement Request for a Research Resource for Ultra-sensitive High Throughput ProteomicsP41GM103493 · NIGMS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2012 to 2022
$22.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ion packets introduced from gates, ion funnel traps, and other conventional ion injection mechanisms produce ion pulse widths typically around a few microseconds or less for ion mobility spectrometry (IMS)-based separations on the order of 100 milliseconds. When such ion injection techniques are coupled with ultralong path length traveling wave (TW)-based IMS separations (i.e., on the order of seconds) using structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIMs), typically very low ion utilization efficiency is achieved for continuous ion sources [e.g., electrospray ionization (ESI)]. Even with the ability to trap and accumulate much larger populations of ions than being conventionally feasible over longer time periods in SLIM devices, the subsequent long separations lead to overall low ion utilization. Here, we report the use of a highly flexible SLIM arrangement, enabling concurrent ion accumulation and separation and achieving near-complete ion utilization with ESI. We characterize the ion accumulation process in SLIM, demonstrate >98% ion utilization, and show both increased signal intensities and measurement throughput. This approach is envisioned to have broad utility to applications, for example, involving the fast detection of trace chemical species.

Indexed as

Ion Mobility SpectrometrySignal-To-Noise RatioSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

Identifiers

PMID33105077
PMCPMC9009212
OpenAlexW3093781545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.