Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104869›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2021

Local antibiotics in primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ahmed Saidahmed, Mohamed Sarraj, Seper Ekhtiari, Raman Mundi, Daniel Tushinski, Thomas J Wood, Mohit Bhandari

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed SaidahmedDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Room G522, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada. ahmed.saidahmed@medportal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-8973
Mohamed SarrajDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Room G522, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Seper EkhtiariDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Room G522, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Raman MundiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Daniel TushinskiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Room G522, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Thomas J WoodDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Room G522, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Mohit BhandariDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Room G522, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
St. Joseph's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection is a truly devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty, causing most patients to undergo a revision surgery, and to bear significant psychological and financial burden. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the literature to determine the efficacy and complication profile of local antibiotic application in primary total joint arthroplasty.

methodsAll studies of primary total joint arthroplasty which assessed local antibiotics in any form other than antibiotic-impregnated cement as an intervention were included. Studies that reported at least one outcome related to infection and were available in full text in English were eligible for inclusion. Studies which included both primary and revision cases but did not report the stratified data for each type of surgery and studies on fracture populations were excluded.

resultsA total of 9 studies involving 3,714 cases were included. The pooled deep infection rate was 1.6% in the intervention groups and 3.5% in the control groups. Meta-analysis revealed a RR of 0.53 (95%CI: 0.35-0.79, p = 0.002) with no heterogeneity (I

conclusionLocal antibiotic application results in a moderate reduction in deep infection rates in primary total joint arthroplasty, with no significant impact on superficial infection rates. However, local antibiotic application may be associated with a moderate increase in aseptic wound complications.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis-Related InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsHumansReoperationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsLocal antibioticPeriprosthetic joint infectionPrimary arthroplastyPrimary hipPrimary kneeVancomycin powder

Identifiers

PMID33104869
OpenAlexW3094413023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.