Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104825›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

Conversion rate of laparoscopic or robotic to open sacrocolpopexy: are there associated factors and complications?

Perrine Capmas, Eva Suarthana, Maryse Larouche

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Robotic sacrocolpopexy.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Perrine CapmasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. perrine.capmas@aphp.fr.
Eva SuarthanaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maryse LaroucheDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the conversion rate of laparoscopic or robotic to open sacrocolpopexy and to identify associated factors in a large population-based database.

methodsWe used Health Care Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) databases 2005-2014. We extracted data on apical suspension and synthetic mesh with laparoscopy or robot in adult women using International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. We evaluated the rate of conversion and used logistic regression to study the association with risk factors.

resultsWe identified 3295 women with laparoscopic or robotic sacrocolpopexies. There were 2777 robotic procedures with 37 conversion (1.33%) and 518 laparoscopic procedures with 37 conversions (7.14%), with an overall conversion rate of 2.2%. Median age was 62 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 55-69]. Concomitant hysterectomy was significantly more frequent in the robotic than laparascopic group (41.7% versus 13.9%, p < 0.01) and was not associated with conversion. Factors associated with lower conversion included a robotic approach (adjusted odd ratio (aOR) 0.32 [95% CI 0.19-0.54]) and private insurance (aOR 0.53 [95% CI 0.32-0.86]). Factors associated with higher conversion were obesity (aOR 3.27 [95% CI 1.72-6.19]) and lysis of adhesions (aOR 3.32 [95% CI 1.89-5.85]). Accidental organ puncture was significantly associated with conversion (14.9% versus 3.8%; p < 0.01).

conclusionIn this American database, the rate of conversion of laparoscopic or robotic to open sacrocolpopexy was low. The majority (84%) of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies used a robotic approach, which was associated with a lower risk of conversion. Obesity and lysis of adhesions were associated with a higher risk of conversion.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesConversion rateLaparoscopic surgeryRobotic surgerySacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID33104825
OpenAlexW3094399856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.