Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104762›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Novel prognostic biomarkers of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

Yu Nishida, Shuhei Hosomi, Hirokazu Yamagami, Koji Fujimoto, Rieko Nakata, Shigehiro Itani, Yuji Nadatani, Shusei Fukunaga, Koji Otani, Fumio Tanaka and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu NishidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shuhei HosomiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hirokazu YamagamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ishikiri Seiki Hospital, Higashi-Osaka, Japan.
Koji FujimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Rieko NakataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shigehiro ItaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yuji NadataniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shusei FukunagaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Koji OtaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Fumio TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuaki NagamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Koichi TairaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Noriko KamataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Toshio WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuhito IsekiDepartment of Gastroenterological surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2559-2180
Tatsunari FukuokaDepartment of Gastroenterological surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masatsune ShibutaniDepartment of Gastroenterological surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hisashi NagaharaDepartment of Gastroenterological surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Satoko OhfujiDepartment of Public health, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3239-5249
Yasuhiro FujiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka City University · JPIshikiriseiki Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPouchitis is a major complication after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Although there have been many investigations of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in various diseases, its role in predicting the development of pouchitis remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the NLR for predicting the development of pouchitis after IPAA in UC patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsUC patients who underwent IPAA at Osaka City University Hospital between May 2006 and March 2019 were included. The incidence of pouchitis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative predictors for pouchitis, including various demographic and clinical variables, were analyzed. The combined impact of the NLR and other known prognostic factors were investigated using Cox proportional hazard regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

resultsForty-nine patients with UC who underwent IPAA were included. The median follow-up period was 18.3 months (interquartile range: 10.7-47.2 months). Eighteen patients (36.7%) developed pouchitis. The incidence of pouchitis was 19.2%, 32.6%, and 45.9% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. NLR was significantly associated with the development of pouchitis in the univariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio (HR), 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.28; P = 0.03). The NLR cutoff value of 2.15 was predictive of the development of pouchitis according to receiver operating characteristic analysis (specificity: 67.7%, sensitivity: 72.2%). The incidence of pouchitis was significantly lower in the low NLR group than that in the high NLR group (P = 0.01, log-rank test). Cox regression analyses using IPTW also identified NLR as a prognostic factor for the development of pouchitis by statistically adjusting for background factors (HR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.31-9.89; P = 0.01).

conclusionsNLR may be a novel and useful indicator for predicting the development of pouchitis after IPAA in UC and should be introduced in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersColitis, UlcerativeFemaleHumansIncidenceLymphocytesMaleNeutrophilsPouchitisProctocolectomy, RestorativePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsROC CurveYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33104762
PMCPMC7588073
OpenAlexW3094058736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.