Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104754›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The association between change of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor R1 (sTNF-R1) measurements and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality-Results from the population-based (Cardiovascular Disease, Living and Ageing in Halle) CARLA study 2002-2016.

Lamiaa Hassan, Daniel Medenwald, Daniel Tiller, Alexander Kluttig, Beatrice Ludwig-Kraus, Frank Bernhard Kraus, Karin H Greiser, Rafael Mikolajczyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New Biomarkers ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lamiaa HassanInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Daniel MedenwaldInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8920-2853
Daniel TillerInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Alexander KluttigInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Beatrice Ludwig-KrausCentral Laboratory, University Hospital Halle, Halle/Saale, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Frank Bernhard KrausCentral Laboratory, University Hospital Halle, Halle/Saale, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4354-9952
Karin H GreiserGerman Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Rafael MikolajczykInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversity Hospital in Halle · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSingle measurements of higher levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I (sTNF-R1) have been shown to be associated with increased risk of mortality. However, up to date, little is known about the underlying temporal dynamics of sTNF-R1 concentrations and their relation with mortality. We aimed to characterize the effect of changes in sTNFR-1 levels on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, independent from other established risk factors for mortality, including other inflammatory markers.

methodsWe used data of the population based cohort study CARLA and included 1408 subjects with sTNF-R1 measured at baseline (2002-2006) and first follow-up (2007-2010). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association of baseline and follow-up sTNF-R1 measurements with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality during ~10 years since the first follow-up after adjusting for relevant confounders.

resultsBased on 211 deaths among 1408 subjects, per each doubling of the baseline sTNF-R1, the risk of all-cause mortality was increased by about 30% (Hazard ratio 1.28, 95% Confidence Interval 0.6-2.7), while per each doubling of the follow-up level of sTNF-R1 mortality was 3-fold (3.11, 1.5-6.5) higher in a model including both measurements and adjusting for confounders. The results were mainly related to the cardiovascular mortality (5.9, 2.1-16.8 per each doubling of follow up sTNF-R1 value).

conclusionSolely the follow-up value, rather than its change from baseline, predicted future mortality. Thus, while sTNF-R1 levels are associated with mortality, particularly cardiovascular, over a long-time period in the general population, if they change, the earlier measurements play no or little role.

Indexed as

MortalityAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type IBiomarkersReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I

Identifiers

PMID33104754
PMCPMC7588092
OpenAlexW3093802057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.