Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104724›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Analysis of craniocerebral injury in facial collision accidents.

Jie Tian, Chuntao Zhang, Qun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie TianCollege of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jaingsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8374-216X
Chuntao ZhangCollege of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jaingsu, China.
Qun WangCollege of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jaingsu, China.
Nanjing Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering that the Pc-Crash multibody dynamics software can reproduce the accident process accurately and obtain the collision parameters of pedestrian heads at the moment of head landing, the finite element analysis method can accurately analyze the injury of the pedestrian head when the boundary conditions are known. This paper combines the accident reconstruction method with the finite element analysis method to study the injury mechanism of pedestrian head impact on the ground in vehicle pedestrian collision accidents to provide a theoretical basis for pedestrian protection and the improvement of vehicle shapes. First, a real-life vehicle pedestrian collision is reproduced by Pc-Crash. The simulation results show that the rigid multibody model can accurately simulate the scene of the accident, then the speed and angle of the pedestrian head landing moment can be obtained at the same time. Second, the finite element model of human heads with a detailed facial structure is established and verified. Finally, the collision parameters obtained from the accident reconstruction are used as the boundary conditions to analyze the collision between the pedestrian head and the ground, and the biomechanical parameters, such as intracranial pressure, von Mises stress, shear stress and strain, can be determined. The results show that the stress wave will propagate inside and outside the skull and cause stress concentration in the skull and the brain tissue to varying degrees after the pedestrian head strikes the ground. When the stress exceeds a certain limit, it will cause different degrees of brain tissue injury.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationCraniocerebral TraumaFinite Element AnalysisHeadHumansModels, TheoreticalPedestriansShear StrengthSoftwareWalking

Identifiers

PMID33104724
PMCPMC7588047
OpenAlexW3093767466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.