Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104718›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Frequency response areas of neurons in the mouse inferior colliculus. III. Time-domain responses: Constancy, dynamics, and precision in relation to spectral resolution, and perception in the time domain.

Marina A Egorova, Alexander G Akimov, Gleb D Khorunzhii, Günter Ehret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marina A EgorovaSechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4216-6469
Alexander G AkimovSechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Gleb D KhorunzhiiSechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Günter EhretInstitute of Neurobiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1201-4878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The auditory midbrain (central nucleus of inferior colliculus, ICC) receives multiple brainstem projections and recodes auditory information for perception in higher centers. Many neural response characteristics are represented in gradients (maps) in the three-dimensional ICC space. Map overlap suggests that neurons, depending on their ICC location, encode information in several domains simultaneously by different aspects of their responses. Thus, interdependence of coding, e.g. in spectral and temporal domains, seems to be a general ICC principle. Studies on covariation of response properties and possible impact on sound perception are, however, rare. Here, we evaluated tone-evoked single neuron activity from the mouse ICC and compared shapes of excitatory frequency-response areas (including strength and shape of inhibition within and around the excitatory area; classes I, II, III) with types of temporal response patterns and first-spike response latencies. Analyses showed covariation of sharpness of frequency tuning with constancy and precision of responding to tone onsets. Highest precision (first-spike latency jitter < 1 ms) and stable phasic responses throughout frequency-response areas were the quality mainly of class III neurons with broad frequency tuning, least influenced by inhibition. Class II neurons with narrow frequency tuning and dominating inhibitory influence were unsuitable for time domain coding with high precision. The ICC center seems specialized rather for high spectral resolution (class II presence), lateral parts for constantly precise responding to sound onsets (class III presence). Further, the variation of tone-response latencies in the frequency-response areas of individual neurons with phasic, tonic, phasic-tonic, or pauser responses gave rise to the definition of a core area, which represented a time window of about 20 ms from tone onset for tone-onset responding of the whole ICC. This time window corresponds to the roughly 20 ms shortest time interval that was found critical in several auditory perceptual tasks in humans and mice.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHearingInferior ColliculiMiceNeuronsPerceptionReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID33104718
PMCPMC7588072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.