Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33104694›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Sugar feeding patterns of New York Aedes albopictus mosquitoes are affected by saturation deficit, flowers, and host seeking.

Kara Fikrig, Sonile Peck, Peter Deckerman, Sharon Dang, Kimberly St Fleur, Henry Goldsmith, Sophia Qu, Hannah Rosenthal, Laura C Harrington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Releasing incompatible males drives strong suppression across populations of wild andProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kara FikrigEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5850-9948
Sonile PeckEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Peter DeckermanEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Sharon DangEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Kimberly St FleurEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8230-0231
Henry GoldsmithEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Sophia QuEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2389-8015
Hannah RosenthalEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Laura C HarringtonEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2143-2051
Cornell University · US

Funding

New Targets for Reproductive Control of Mosquito VectorsR01AI095491 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Laura C Harrington, Mariana Federica Wolfner · 2011 to 2026
$7.3M
NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000509NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSugar feeding is an important behavior which may determine vector potential of female mosquitoes. Sugar meals can reduce blood feeding frequency, enhance survival, and decrease fecundity, as well as provide energetic reserves to fuel energy intensive behaviors such as mating and host seeking. Sugar feeding behavior can be harnessed for vector control (e.g. attractive toxic sugar baits). Few studies have addressed sugar feeding of Aedes albopictus, a vector of arboviruses of public health importance, including dengue and Zika viruses. To address this knowledge gap, we assessed sugar feeding patterns of Ae. albopictus for the first time in its invasive northeastern USA range. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsUsing the cold anthrone fructose assay with robust sample sizes, we demonstrated that a large percentage of both male (49.6%) and female (41.8%) Ae. albopictus fed on plant or homopteran derived sugar sources within 24 hrs prior to capture. Our results suggest that sugar feeding behavior increases when environmental conditions are dry (high saturation deficit) and may vary by behavioral status (host seeking vs. resting). Furthermore, mosquitoes collected on properties with flowers (>3 blooms) had higher fructose concentrations compared to those collected from properties with few to no flowers (0-3). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results provide the first evidence of Ae. albopictus sugar feeding behavior in the Northeastern US and reveal relatively high rates of sugar feeding. These results suggest the potential success for regional deployment of toxic sugar baits. In addition, we demonstrate the impact of several environmental and mosquito parameters (saturation deficit, presence of flowers, host seeking status, and sex) on sugar feeding. Placing sugar feeding behavior in the context of these environmental and mosquito parameters provides further insight into spatiotemporal dynamics of feeding behavior for Ae. albopictus, and in turn, provides information for evidence-based control decisions.

Indexed as

FructoseAedesAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorFemaleFlowersHost-Seeking BehaviorHumansMaleMosquito VectorsNew YorkFructose

Identifiers

PMID33104694
PMCPMC7644106
OpenAlexW3093776968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.