ReviewStroke2020
Approaches to Studying Determinants of Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Stroke and Its Sequelae.
Review in Stroke, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic predisposition to diabetes and risk of stroke in a Native Hawaiian population.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2026Article
- Age, race, and education as moderators of post-stroke cognitive decline following dental care.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Article
- Global and Regional Burden of Ischemic Stroke Disease from 1990 to 2021: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.Translational stroke research · 2025Article
- Article
- Cerebral arteriolosclerosis, lacunar infarcts, and cognition in older Black adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Article
- Ethnic and Gender Variations in Ischemic Stroke Patterns among Arab Populations in Northern Israel: A Preliminary Exploration towards Culturally Aware Personalized Stroke Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Racial disparities in stroke incidence in the Women's Health Initiative: Exploring biological, behavioral, psychosocial, and social risk factors.SSM - population health · 2024Article
- Protocol for exploring pathways to equitable outcomes in post-stroke aphasia and dysphagia.PloS one · 2024Article
- A retrospective analysis of the social determinants of health affecting stroke outcomes in a small hospital situated in a health professional shortage area (HPSA).PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Perceived Interpersonal Racism and Incident Stroke Among US Black Women.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Advancing stroke genetics in Hawai'i and the Pacific Islands.Frontiers in stroke · 2023Article
- Editorial: Stroke in minority groups and populations.Frontiers in stroke · 2023Article
- Article
- Predictors of Recurrent Venous Thrombosis After Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Analysis of the ACTION-CVT Study.Neurology · 2022Article
- Cognitive Impairment and Dementia After Stroke: Design and Rationale for the DISCOVERY Study.Stroke · 2021Review
- The Modified Early Warning Score: A Useful Marker of Neurological Worsening but Unreliable Predictor of Sepsis in the Neurocritically Ill-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Critical care explorations · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Disparities are differences in health outcomes among groups that originate from sources including historically experienced social injustice and broadly defined environmental exposures. Large health disparities exist, defined by many factors including race/ethnicity, sex, age, geography, and socioeconomic status. Studying disparities relies on measures of disease burden. Traditional measures, such as mortality, may be less applicable to neurological disorders, which often lead to substantial morbidity and lower quality of life, without necessarily causing death. Measures such as disability-adjusted life-years or healthy life expectancy may be more appropriate for assessing neurological disease and permit comparisons across diseases and communities. There are many approaches that can be used to study disparities. Analyses of population-based observational studies, patient registries, and administrative data all contribute to the understanding of disparities in humans. Animal and other experimental designs, including clinical trials, may be used to identify mechanisms and strategies to reduce disparities. All of these approaches have strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, understanding and mitigating disparities will require use of all of these methods. Crucially, a focus on not only improving outcomes among all individuals in society but minimizing or eliminating differences between those with better outcomes and those who have historically been disadvantaged should drive the ongoing investigations into disparities. This review is focused on epidemiological approaches to examining the depth and determinants of racial-ethnic disparities in the United States related to stroke, stroke care, and stroke outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.